Top issues
Problem
Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) are structured addresses that point to locations and assets on the internet. URLs allow software developers to build complex applications that exchange data with servers that can be hosted in multiple geographical regions. URLs can commonly be found embedded in documentation, configuration files, source code and compiled binaries. One or more embedded URLs were discovered to link to raw files hosted on GitHub. Attackers often abuse popular web services to host malicious payloads. Since code-sharing services URLs are typically allowed by security solutions, using them for payload delivery increases the odds that the malicious code will reach the user. While the presence of code-sharing service locations does not imply malicious intent, all of their uses in a software package should be documented and approved. An increasing number of software supply chain attacks in the open source space leverages the GitHub service to deliver malicious payloads.Prevalence in NuGet community
0 packages
found in
Top 100
22 packages
found in
Top 1k
142 packages
found in
Top 10k
59.57k packages
in community
Next steps
Investigate reported detections.
If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.
Consider an alternative delivery mechanism for software packages.
Detected Linux executable files that might set writable and executable permissions to the code segment, making non-executable memory mitigations less effective.
Causes risk: ineffective mitigations detected
hardening
Problem
Presence of code relocations indicates that the code segment might temporarily, at one point, become both writable and executable. That violates security policies adopted by most modern Linux distributions. During the brief period in which the code segment is both writable and executable, the attacker may be able to overwrite the code with a malicious program.Prevalence in NuGet community
0 packages
found in
Top 100
0 packages
found in
Top 1k
1 packages
found in
Top 10k
218 packages
in community
Next steps
Code relocations often appear due to inadequately written inline assembly, or when programs are not compiled with the appropriate position-independent code flag (e.g. -fPIC). In most cases, manual inspection may be required.
Detected Linux executable files that were compiled without any dynamic symbol hijacking protections.
Causes risk: execution hijacking concerns
hardening
Problem
On Linux, external symbols are resolved via the procedure linkage table (PLT) and the global offset table (GOT). The global offset table is split into two tables - one for external data, and one for external functions. Without any protection, both are writable at runtime and thus leave the executable vulnerable to data overwrite attacks and pointer hijacking. Data overwrite attacks can be mitigated by using partial read-only relocations, while pointer hijacking can be mitigated with full read-only relocations. Both approaches have some drawbacks. Partial read-only relocations don't provide full protection, because the external function GOT remains writable. Full read-only relocations require that all external function symbols are resolved at load-time instead of during execution. This may increase loading time for large programs.Prevalence in NuGet community
0 packages
found in
Top 100
1 packages
found in
Top 1k
12 packages
found in
Top 10k
1.45k packages
in community
Next steps
In most cases, it's recommended to use full read-only relocations (in GCC: -Wl,-z,relro,-z,now).
If the executable load-time is an issue, you should use partial read-only relocations.
Problem
Software components contain executable code that performs actions implemented during its development. These actions are called behaviors. In the analysis report, behaviors are presented as human-readable descriptions that best match the underlying code intent. While most behaviors are benign, some are commonly abused by malicious software with the intent to cause harm. When a software package shares behavior traits with malicious software, it may become flagged by security solutions. Any detection from security solutions can cause friction for the end-users during software deployment. While the behavior is likely intended by the developer, there is a small chance this detection is true positive, and an early indication of a software supply chain attack.Prevalence in NuGet community
0 packages
found in
Top 100
0 packages
found in
Top 1k
4 packages
found in
Top 10k
1.09k packages
in community
Next steps
Investigate reported detections.
If the software intent does not relate to the reported behavior, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.
Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.
Detected digital signatures that rely on a weak digest algorithm for integrity validation.
signatures
Problem
Digital signatures are applied to applications, packages and documents as a cryptographically secured authenticity record. Signatures verify the origin and the integrity of the object they apply to. The integrity validation relies on the cryptographic strength of the encryption and the hash verification algorithm. If either of the two is considered weak by current standards, there is a chance the signed object could be maliciously modified, without triggering the integrity failure check.Prevalence in NuGet community
0 packages
found in
Top 100
38 packages
found in
Top 1k
315 packages
found in
Top 10k
733.24k packages
in community
Next steps
Create signatures with strong ECC key-length of at least 224 bits, or RSA key-length of at least 2048 bits, and use SHA256 as the hashing algorithm. While encryption key-length upgrade does require you to obtain a new certificate, the hashing algorithm can freely be selected during signing.
With Microsoft SignTool, you can specify the hashing algorithm using the /fd SHA256 parameter.
Top behaviors
Contains URLs that link to raw files on GitHub.
network
Prevalence in NuGet community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
0 packages
found in
Top 100
22 packages
found in
Top 1k
142 packages
found in
Top 10k
59.98k packages
in community
Contains IP addresses.
network
Prevalence in NuGet community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
0 packages
found in
Top 100
59 packages
found in
Top 1k
458 packages
found in
Top 10k
532.61k packages
in community
Generates additional assembly modules.
execution
Prevalence in NuGet community
Behavior uncommon for this community (Uncommon)
0 packages
found in
Top 100
3 packages
found in
Top 1k
19 packages
found in
Top 10k
3.75k packages
in community
Retrieves the name of the executable file for the specified process.
search
Prevalence in NuGet community
No behavior prevalence information at this timeEnumerates system information.
search
Prevalence in NuGet community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
0 packages
found in
Top 100
23 packages
found in
Top 1k
177 packages
found in
Top 10k
65.69k packages
in community
Top vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities found.