Top issues
Detected presence of known software supply chain attack artifacts.
Causes risk: supply chain attack artifacts
threats
Problem
Proprietary ReversingLabs malware detection algorithms have determined that the software package contains one or more malicious components. The detection was made by either a static byte signature, software component identity, or a complete file hash. This malware detection method is considered highly accurate, and can typically attribute malware to previously discovered software supply chain attacks. It is common to have multiple supply chain attack artifacts that relate to a single malware incident.Prevalence in NuGet community
0 packages
found in
Top 100
0 packages
found in
Top 1k
0 packages
found in
Top 10k
741 packages
in community
Next steps
If the software intent does not relate to malicious behavior, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
Avoid using this software package.
Detected presence of malicious files through analyst-vetted file reputation.
Causes risk: analyst-vetted malware found
threats
Problem
Threat researchers have manually inspected the software package and determined that it contains one or more malicious files. The detection was made by a hash-based file reputation lookup. This malware detection method is considered highly accurate, and can typically identify the malware family by name.Prevalence in NuGet community
0 packages
found in
Top 100
0 packages
found in
Top 1k
0 packages
found in
Top 10k
741 packages
in community
Next steps
Investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
Avoid using this software package.
Detected presence of software components that can tamper with the system security software.
hunting
Problem
Software components sometimes need to interact with higher privilege parts of the operating system, often requiring administrative access to accomplish a task. Operating systems integrate first and third-party security solutions that can detect and block malicious code. For that reason, attackers often aim to tamper with system security software. Changing antivirus and other security software service settings may enable malicious code to execute without being blocked. While the presence of code that tampers with system security software does not necessarily imply malicious intent, all of its uses in a software package should be documented and approved. Only select applications should consider using functions that can temporarily disable system security features. One example of acceptable use for such functions is allowing specialized applications to modify protected folders and settings.Prevalence in NuGet community
0 packages
found in
Top 100
0 packages
found in
Top 1k
5 packages
found in
Top 10k
299 packages
in community
Next steps
Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.
Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1562.001 - Disable or Modify Tools.
Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.
Problem
Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) are structured addresses that point to locations and assets on the internet. URLs allow software developers to build complex applications that exchange data with servers that can be hosted in multiple geographical regions. URLs can commonly be found embedded in documentation, configuration files, source code and compiled binaries. One or more embedded URLs were discovered to link to raw files hosted on GitHub. Attackers often abuse popular web services to host malicious payloads. Since code-sharing services URLs are typically allowed by security solutions, using them for payload delivery increases the odds that the malicious code will reach the user. While the presence of code-sharing service locations does not imply malicious intent, all of their uses in a software package should be documented and approved. An increasing number of software supply chain attacks in the open source space leverages the GitHub service to deliver malicious payloads.Prevalence in NuGet community
0 packages
found in
Top 100
22 packages
found in
Top 1k
142 packages
found in
Top 10k
59574 packages
in community
Next steps
Investigate reported detections.
If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.
Consider an alternative delivery mechanism for software packages.
Detected presence of software components that were removed from the public package repository.
Causes risk: components prone to hijacking
hunting
Problem
Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Software developers publish components they have authored to public repositories. Open source projects are the intellectual property of their respective authors. At any time, the authors may choose to completely remove the software component from a public repository. This often occurs when a software project reaches its end-of-life stage, or when the software authors lose interest in maintaining the project. This kind of removal frees up the software package name, its unique software identifier in the public repository, for other developers to use. However, new software project owners might have malicious intent. Threat actors are continuously monitoring popular package names in case their unique identifiers suddenly become available for hijacking. Once the software projects falls under new ownership, the new maintainers may opt to use the project popularity to spread malware to unsuspecting users.Prevalence in NuGet community
No prevalence information at this timeNext steps
Inspect behaviors exhibited by the detected software components.
If the software behaviors differ from expected, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
Revise the use of components that raise these alarms. If you can't deprecate those components, make sure that their versions are pinned.
Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.
Top behaviors
Creates or changes item properties, such as registry keys.
settings
Prevalence in NuGet community
Behavior uncommon for this community (Uncommon)
0 packages
found in
Top 100
0 packages
found in
Top 1k
1 packages
found in
Top 10k
159 packages
in community
Loads additional snap-ins or modules to the current session.
payload
Prevalence in NuGet community
Behavior uncommon for this community (Uncommon)
0 packages
found in
Top 100
0 packages
found in
Top 1k
4 packages
found in
Top 10k
1260 packages
in community
Interacts with Microsoft .NET Framework code, types and assemblies.
execution
Prevalence in NuGet community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
0 packages
found in
Top 100
9 packages
found in
Top 1k
54 packages
found in
Top 10k
4258 packages
in community
Executes a file.
execution
Prevalence in NuGet community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
0 packages
found in
Top 100
12 packages
found in
Top 1k
98 packages
found in
Top 10k
39014 packages
in community
Evaluates code dynamically.
execution
Prevalence in NuGet community
Behavior uncommon for this community (Uncommon)
0 packages
found in
Top 100
0 packages
found in
Top 1k
3 packages
found in
Top 10k
1082 packages
in community
Top vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities found.