Spectra Assure
Community
passEverything is awesome!
Scanned: 3 days ago

MDAnalysis

Artifact:
latest
Top 10k
An object-oriented toolkit to analyze molecular dynamics trajectories.
License: unknown
Published: 2 months ago




SAFE Assessment

Compliance

Licenses
No license compliance issues
Secrets
No sensitive information found

Security

Vulnerabilities
No known vulnerabilities detected
Hardening
28 low priority mitigations absent

Threats

Tampering
No evidence of software tampering
Malware
No evidence of malware inclusion

Popularity

4.05M
Total Downloads
Contributors
Declared Dependencies
237
Dependents

Top issues

Problem

Control Flow Guard (CFG/CFI) protects the code flow integrity by ensuring that dynamic calls are made only to vetted functions. Trusted execution paths rely on the ability of the operating system to build a list of valid function targets. Certain functions can intentionally be disallowed to prevent malicious code from deactivating vulnerability mitigation features. A list of such invalid function targets can include publicly exported symbols. Applications that enhance control flow integrity through export suppression rely on libraries to mark their publicly visible symbols as suppressed. This is done for all symbols that are considered to be sensitive functions, and to which access should be restricted. It is considered dangerous to mix applications that perform export suppression with libraries that do not.

Prevalence in PyPI community

30 packages
found in
Top 100
143 packages
found in
Top 1k
833 packages
found in
Top 10k
15.19k packages
in community

Next steps

To enable this mitigation on library code, refer to your programming language toolchain documentation.
In Microsoft VisualStudio, you can enable CFG mitigation by passing the /guard:cf parameter to the compiler and linker.

Problem

Control Flow Guard (CFG/CFI) protects the code flow integrity by ensuring that indirect calls are made only to vetted functions. This mitigation protects dynamically resolved function targets by instrumenting the code responsible for transferring execution control. Higher-level programming languages implement structured exception handling by managing their own code flow execution paths. As such, they are subject to code flow hijacking during runtime. Language-specific exception handling mitigation enforces execution integrity by instrumenting calls to manage execution context switching. Any deviation from the known and trusted code flow paths will cause the application to terminate. This makes malicious code less likely to execute.

Prevalence in PyPI community

36 packages
found in
Top 100
164 packages
found in
Top 1k
932 packages
found in
Top 10k
17.86k packages
in community

Next steps

It's highly recommended to enable this option for all software components used at security boundaries, or those that process user controlled inputs.
To enable this mitigation, refer to your programming language toolchain documentation.
In Microsoft VisualStudio, you can enable CFG mitigation by passing the /guard:cf parameter to the compiler and linker.

Problem

Operating systems allow multiple user accounts to coexist on a single computer system. Each registered user has identity information associated with their account. At the very least, user accounts consist of a user name and an optional password. In some cases, user account data may also include personally identifiable information. Extended personal information may include user's given and last name, their email and mailing address, personal photo and their telephone number. Financially motivated attackers may seek to collect personal information for purposes of selling the private data to a third-party. Malicious code that typically exhibits these behavior traits is commonly referred to as an information stealer. While the presence of code that accesses identity information does not necessarily imply malicious intent, all of its uses in a software package should be documented and approved. Accessing identity information is a very common behavior for software packages. One example of acceptable use for such functions is verifying that the active user has purchased a software license that allows them to run the application.

Prevalence in PyPI community

16 packages
found in
Top 100
113 packages
found in
Top 1k
669 packages
found in
Top 10k
19.67k packages
in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.
Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1033 - System Owner/User Discovery.

Top behaviors

Prevalence in PyPI community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
76 packages
found in
Top 100
459 packages
found in
Top 1k
3531 packages
found in
Top 10k
105.97k packages
in community

Prevalence in PyPI community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
69 packages
found in
Top 100
506 packages
found in
Top 1k
3612 packages
found in
Top 10k
163.85k packages
in community

Prevalence in PyPI community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
9 packages
found in
Top 100
48 packages
found in
Top 1k
305 packages
found in
Top 10k
7.15k packages
in community

Prevalence in PyPI community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
9 packages
found in
Top 100
56 packages
found in
Top 1k
275 packages
found in
Top 10k
4.63k packages
in community

Prevalence in PyPI community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
67 packages
found in
Top 100
525 packages
found in
Top 1k
4055 packages
found in
Top 10k
154.83k packages
in community

Top vulnerabilities

Vulnerability Exploitation Lifecycle
(1 Active Vulnerabilities)
None
None
None
None
Exploits Unknown
Exploits Exist
Exploited by Malware
Patching Mandated