Spectra Assure
Community
Docs
passEverything is awesome!
Scanned: about 22 hours ago

chef-config

latest
Top 1k
Chef Infra's default configuration and config loading library
License: Permissive (Apache-2.0)
New!
Published: about 22 hours ago




SAFE Assessment

Compliance

Licenses
No license compliance issues
Secrets
No sensitive information found

Security

Vulnerabilities
No known vulnerabilities detected
Hardening
No application hardening issues

Threats

Tampering
No evidence of software tampering
Malware
No evidence of malware inclusion

Popularity

54.02M
Total Downloads
Contributor
Declared Dependencies
11
Dependents

Top issues

Problem

Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) are structured addresses that point to locations and assets on the internet. URLs allow software developers to build complex applications that exchange data with servers that can be hosted in multiple geographical regions. URLs can commonly be found embedded in documentation, configuration files, source code and compiled binaries. A port number is associated with a network address of a host, such as an IP address, and the type of network protocol used for communication. Within URLs, the ports are optional. Ports can be specified in a URL immediately following the domain name. Each network protocol, or schema, has a set of standard ports on which the service operates. This issue is raised when a mismatch between a network protocol and its expected port number is detected. While the presence of non-standard ports does not imply malicious intent, all of their uses in a software package should be documented and approved.

Prevalence in RubyGems community

27 packages
found in
Top 100
375 packages
found in
Top 1k
1571 packages
found in
Top 10k
15785 packages
in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.
If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.
Consider changing the port to one that is standard for the networking protocol.

Problem

Private keys and certificates are considered sensitive information that should not be included in released software packages. However, developers frequently release sensitive information alongside their applications to facilitate automated software testing. Testing keys and certificates often proliferate through the software supply chain. When such information gets shared publicly, it is catalogued by file reputation databases. Any private key and certificate files seen by a file reputation database prior to configured time threshold can be automatically suppressed. Commonly shared sensitive information is not considered to be secret.

Prevalence in RubyGems community

16 packages
found in
Top 100
83 packages
found in
Top 1k
671 packages
found in
Top 10k
5227 packages
in community

Next steps

Review the commonly shared sensitive information for evidence of inadvertently exposed secrets.
If the keys were published unintentionally and the software has been made public, you should revoke the keys and file a security incident.

Problem

Operating systems allow multiple user accounts to coexist on a single computer system. Each registered user has identity information associated with their account. At the very least, user accounts consist of a user name and an optional password. In some cases, user account data may also include personally identifiable information. Extended personal information may include user's given and last name, their email and mailing address, personal photo and their telephone number. Financially motivated attackers may seek to collect personal information for purposes of selling the private data to a third-party. Malicious code that typically exhibits these behavior traits is commonly referred to as an information stealer. While the presence of code that accesses identity information does not necessarily imply malicious intent, all of its uses in a software package should be documented and approved. Accessing identity information is a very common behavior for software packages. One example of acceptable use for such functions is verifying that the active user has purchased a software license that allows them to run the application.

Prevalence in RubyGems community

0 packages
found in
Top 100
12 packages
found in
Top 1k
75 packages
found in
Top 10k
628 packages
in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.
Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1033 - System Owner/User Discovery.

Top behaviors

Prevalence in RubyGems community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
7 packages
found in
Top 100
33 packages
found in
Top 1k
143 packages
found in
Top 10k
1133 packages
in community

Prevalence in RubyGems community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
27 packages
found in
Top 100
376 packages
found in
Top 1k
1574 packages
found in
Top 10k
15826 packages
in community

Prevalence in RubyGems community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
13 packages
found in
Top 100
54 packages
found in
Top 1k
440 packages
found in
Top 10k
3598 packages
in community

Prevalence in RubyGems community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
68 packages
found in
Top 100
566 packages
found in
Top 1k
3736 packages
found in
Top 10k
43562 packages
in community

Prevalence in RubyGems community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
45 packages
found in
Top 100
186 packages
found in
Top 1k
1704 packages
found in
Top 10k
18027 packages
in community

Top vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities found.