Top issues
Detected presence of malicious files by a heuristic signature.
Causes risk: malicious components found
threats
Problem
Proprietary ReversingLabs malware detection algorithms have determined that the software package contains one or more malicious files. The detection was made by a heuristic signature. This malware detection method is considered proactive, and can typically identify the malware family or at least the threat type.Prevalence in RubyGems community
0 packages
found in
Top 100
0 packages
found in
Top 1k
4 packages
found in
Top 10k
15 packages
in community
Next steps
Inspect behaviors exhibited by the detected software components.
If the software behaviors differ from expected, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.
Consider rewriting code that may have triggered the detection due to its malware similarity.
Problem
Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) are structured addresses that point to locations and assets on the internet. URLs allow software developers to build complex applications that exchange data with servers that can be hosted in multiple geographical regions. URLs can commonly be found embedded in documentation, configuration files, source code and compiled binaries. One or more embedded URLs were discovered to link to raw files hosted on GitHub. Attackers often abuse popular web services to host malicious payloads. Since code-sharing services URLs are typically allowed by security solutions, using them for payload delivery increases the odds that the malicious code will reach the user. While the presence of code-sharing service locations does not imply malicious intent, all of their uses in a software package should be documented and approved. An increasing number of software supply chain attacks in the open source space leverages the GitHub service to deliver malicious payloads.Prevalence in RubyGems community
8 packages
found in
Top 100
60 packages
found in
Top 1k
609 packages
found in
Top 10k
5.18k packages
in community
Next steps
Investigate reported detections.
If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.
Consider an alternative delivery mechanism for software packages.
Detected presence of files containing domains used for intercepting and inspecting HTTP requests.
hunting
Problem
Applications communicate with web services by exchanging HTTP requests. During software development, externally hosted services are used by developers to debug software quality issues relating to exchanging HTTP requests. Attackers commonly abuse tools designed for HTTP request inspection to monitor network traffic and extract sensitive information from the HTTP traffic. While the presence of domains related to HTTP inspection does not imply malicious intent, all of their uses in a software package should be documented and approved. Attackers might have purposely injected security testing tools in the software package to monitor the network traffic of the infected computer system. It is also possible that the software package has mistakenly included a part of its testing infrastructure during packaging.Prevalence in RubyGems community
3 packages
found in
Top 100
6 packages
found in
Top 1k
48 packages
found in
Top 10k
403 packages
in community
Next steps
Investigate reported detections.
If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.
Consider removing all references to flagged network locations.
Detected presence of software components that had a recent malware or tampering incident.
Causes risk: components with malware history
hunting
Problem
Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Software developers publish components they have authored to public repositories. Some open source projects have a history of security lapses that culminated with a publication of one or more malicious component versions. To ensure that repeated supply chain incidents do not occur, the open source project should be closely monitored for up to two years. All software package versions that are published within two years of the malware incident will convey a warning about the history of security incidents tied to the open source project.Prevalence in RubyGems community
1 packages
found in
Top 100
3 packages
found in
Top 1k
41 packages
found in
Top 10k
294 packages
in community
Next steps
Inspect behaviors exhibited by the detected software components.
If the software behaviors differ from expected, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
Revise the use of components that raise these alarms. If you can't deprecate those components, make sure that their versions are pinned.
Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.
Problem
Software components contain executable code that performs actions implemented during its development. These actions are called behaviors. In the analysis report, behaviors are presented as human-readable descriptions that best match the underlying code intent. While most behaviors are benign, some are commonly abused by malicious software with the intent to cause harm. When a software package shares behavior traits with malicious software, it may become flagged by security solutions. Any detection from security solutions can cause friction for the end-users during software deployment. While the behavior is likely intended by the developer, there is a small chance this detection is true positive, and an early indication of a software supply chain attack.Prevalence in RubyGems community
5 packages
found in
Top 100
25 packages
found in
Top 1k
162 packages
found in
Top 10k
1.91k packages
in community
Next steps
Investigate reported detections.
If the software intent does not relate to the reported behavior, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.
Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.
Top behaviors
Contains URLs that use typosquatted variations of trusted domains.
network
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior commonly used by malicious software (Important)
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
1 packages
found in
Top 100
6 packages
found in
Top 1k
37 packages
found in
Top 10k
176 packages
in community
Contains URLs that use punycode spoofed variations of trusted domains.
network
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior commonly used by malicious software (Important)
Behavior uncommon for this community (Uncommon)
0 packages
found in
Top 100
0 packages
found in
Top 1k
4 packages
found in
Top 10k
9 packages
in community
Contains URLs that use homoglyph spoofed variations of trusted domains.
network
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior commonly used by malicious software (Important)
Behavior uncommon for this community (Uncommon)
0 packages
found in
Top 100
0 packages
found in
Top 1k
6 packages
found in
Top 10k
15 packages
in community
Modifies file/directory permissions.
permissions
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
16 packages
found in
Top 100
64 packages
found in
Top 1k
560 packages
found in
Top 10k
8.56k packages
in community
Contains URLs related to banking and monetary institutions.
network
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
8 packages
found in
Top 100
16 packages
found in
Top 1k
130 packages
found in
Top 10k
1.4k packages
in community
Top vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities found.