Top issues
Problem
Operating systems execute application code in multiple privilege access levels. Separation of privileges is designed to protect the stability and integrity of the operating system by shielding it from issues that the user run applications may cause. However, some users may need to interact with higher privilege parts of the operating system to accomplish specific tasks. For this purpose, operating systems provide facilities that users may leverage to temporarily elevate their running privileges. Users with higher privileges can run any application with the same privilege level as their own. Attackers often try to trick privileged users into running malicious code, enabling them to infect the operating system. While the presence of code that elevates user privileges does not necessarily imply malicious intent, all of its uses in a software package should be documented and approved. Only select applications should consider using functions that can elevate user privileges. One example of acceptable use for such functions is allowing the users to install software packages and updates.Prevalence in RubyGems community
1 packages
found in
Top 100
5 packages
found in
Top 1k
45 packages
found in
Top 10k
290 packages
in community
Next steps
Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.
Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1548 - Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism.
Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.
Detected presence of software components that had a recent package version removal incident.
hunting
Problem
Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Software developers publish components they have authored to public repositories. Some open source repositories allow the developers to take down software component versions that they have published. For open source projects, version unpublishing is uncommon. Versions are typically removed due to a security incident, such as malicious code tampering or accidental development secrets exposure. Software developers often prioritize taking down such packages before informing the community that they have experienced a security incident. Therefore, it is prudent to review the reasons behind software version removals as these events might be a signal of an ongoing software supply chain attack.Prevalence in RubyGems community
No prevalence information at this timeNext steps
Review software component documentation for the reasons behind the recent version removal.
If the software version was removed due to a security incident, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
Revise the use of components that raise these alarms. If you can't deprecate those components, make sure that their versions are pinned.
Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.
Detected presence of medium severity vulnerabilities.
Causes risk: medium severity vulnerabilities
vulnerabilities
Problem
Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as medium severity.Prevalence in RubyGems community
37 packages
found in
Top 100
241 packages
found in
Top 1k
3097 packages
found in
Top 10k
47522 packages
in community
Next steps
Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.
Update the component to the latest version.
If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.
Detected presence of software components that are rarely included by other public software packages.
hunting
Problem
Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Software developers publish components they have authored to public repositories. While a new software project is a welcome addition to the open source community. it is not always prudent to indiscriminately use the latest components when building a commercial application. Irrespective of the software quality, the danger of using components that are rarely used to build applications lies in the fact that the software component may contain novel, currently undetected malicious code. Therefore, it is prudent to review software component behaviors and even try out software component in a sandbox, an environment meant for testing untrusted code.Prevalence in RubyGems community
No prevalence information at this timeNext steps
Check the software component behaviors for anomalies.
Consider exploratory software component testing within a sandbox environment.
Consider replacing the software component with a more widely used alternative.
Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.
Problem
Private keys and certificates are considered sensitive information that should not be included in released software packages. However, developers frequently release sensitive information alongside their applications to facilitate automated software testing. Testing keys and certificates often proliferate through the software supply chain. When such information gets shared publicly, it is catalogued by file reputation databases. Any private key and certificate files seen by a file reputation database prior to configured time threshold can be automatically suppressed. Commonly shared sensitive information is not considered to be secret.Prevalence in RubyGems community
16 packages
found in
Top 100
83 packages
found in
Top 1k
671 packages
found in
Top 10k
5227 packages
in community
Next steps
Review the commonly shared sensitive information for evidence of inadvertently exposed secrets.
If the keys were published unintentionally and the software has been made public, you should revoke the keys and file a security incident.
Top behaviors
Accesses /etc/init.d directory.
file
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior uncommon for this community (Uncommon)
1 packages
found in
Top 100
4 packages
found in
Top 1k
50 packages
found in
Top 10k
453 packages
in community
Modifies file/directory permissions.
permissions
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
16 packages
found in
Top 100
66 packages
found in
Top 1k
577 packages
found in
Top 10k
4368 packages
in community
Accesses the /etc/selinux/config file.
file
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior uncommon for this community (Uncommon)
0 packages
found in
Top 100
0 packages
found in
Top 1k
1 packages
found in
Top 10k
6 packages
in community
Attempts to spawn a root shell.
behavior
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior uncommon for this community (Uncommon)
0 packages
found in
Top 100
3 packages
found in
Top 1k
28 packages
found in
Top 10k
184 packages
in community
Contains URLs that link to interesting file formats.
network
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
53 packages
found in
Top 100
247 packages
found in
Top 1k
2209 packages
found in
Top 10k
16324 packages
in community
Top vulnerabilities
Vulnerability Exploitation Lifecycle
(1 Active Vulnerabilities)
1 (1 Fixable)
CVE-2019-16779m
None
None
None
Exploits Unknown
Exploits Exist
Exploited by Malware
Patching Mandated