Top issues
Detected presence of software components distributed with copyleft licenses.
Causes risk: copyleft licensed components
licenses
Problem
Software license is a legal instrument that governs the use and distribution of software source code and its binary representation. Software publishers have the freedom to choose any commonly used or purposefully written license to publish their work under. While some licenses are liberal and allow almost any kind of distribution, with or without code modification, other licenses are more restrictive and impose rules for their inclusion in other software projects. Copyleft licenses in particular impose substantial restrictions on the licensee. They typically require that any derived works, and even software code that merely interacts with copyleft code, be licensed under the same license. Since copyleft licenses are commonly applied to open source code, their inclusion requires that the entire software package becomes open sourced. For commercial applications, this is typically undesirable. Therefore, the inclusion of copyleft code is commonly avoided or even prohibited by the organization policy.Prevalence in RubyGems community
7 packages
found in
Top 100
38 packages
found in
Top 1k
291 packages
found in
Top 10k
6.89k packages
in community
Next steps
Confirm that the software package includes a copyleft component.
Investigate if the software publisher provides this component under a non-copyleft license.
Consider replacing the software component with an alternative that offers a license compatible with commercial use.
Detected presence of licenses that place restrictions on software distribution.
Causes risk: software distribution restrictions
licenses
Problem
Software license is a legal instrument that governs the use and distribution of software source code and its binary representation. Software publishers have the freedom to choose any commonly used or purposefully written license to publish their work under. While some licenses are liberal and allow almost any kind of distribution, with or without code modification, other licenses are more restrictive and impose rules for their inclusion in other software projects. Some software licenses place restrictions on software distribution of the code they apply to. These restrictions may extend to the services built upon the code licensed under such restrictive licenses. Some restrictive licenses explicitly state that the licensee may not provide the software to third parties as a hosted or managed service, where the service provides users with access to any substantial set of the features or functionality of the licensed software. When building commercial applications, this is typically undesirable. Therefore, the inclusion of any code that may impose limits on software distribution is commonly avoided or even prohibited by the organization policy.Prevalence in RubyGems community
9 packages
found in
Top 100
47 packages
found in
Top 1k
402 packages
found in
Top 10k
8.2k packages
in community
Next steps
Confirm that the software package references a component or a dependency with a restrictive license.
Consider replacing the software component with an alternative that offers a license compatible with organization policy.
Detected Linux executable files that do not implement the ASLR vulnerability mitigation protection.
Causes risk: baseline mitigations missing
hardening
Problem
ASLR (address-space layout randomization) is a mitigation technique that increases the difficulty of performing buffer-overflow attacks that require the attacker to know the address of the program in memory. This is done by loading the program at a randomly selected address in the process' address space. ASLR-enabled kernels can choose a random load address only for position-independent executables and code.Prevalence in RubyGems community
0 packages
found in
Top 100
9 packages
found in
Top 1k
46 packages
found in
Top 10k
2.69k packages
in community
Next steps
To support ASLR, the program must be compiled as position-independent code. In most compilers, this is done by passing the corresponding position-independent flag, such as -fPIC for shared libraries or -fPIE for executables.
Detected Linux executable files that were compiled without the recommended dynamic symbol hijacking protections.
Causes risk: execution hijacking concerns
hardening
Problem
On Linux, external symbols are resolved via the procedure linkage table (PLT) and the global offset table (GOT). Without any protection, both are writable at runtime and thus leave the executable vulnerable to pointer hijacking - an attack where the function address is overwritten with an address of a malicious function. Pointer hijacking can be mitigated by using full read-only relocations, which instruct the compiler to unify global offset tables into a single read-only table. This requires that all external function symbols are resolved at load-time instead of during execution, and may increase loading time for large programs.Prevalence in RubyGems community
3 packages
found in
Top 100
12 packages
found in
Top 1k
95 packages
found in
Top 10k
2.46k packages
in community
Next steps
In most cases, it's recommended to use full read-only relocations (in GCC: -Wl,-z,relro,-z,now).
If the executable load-time is an issue, you should use partial read-only relocations.
Problem
Debug databases are typically only used during software development. On Windows, they are usually files embedded into the executable (PDB), while on Linux, they're contained inside special executable sections. The databases contain private debug symbols that make it significantly easier to reverse-engineer a closed-source application. In some cases, having a debug database is equivalent to having access to the source code. Presence of debug databases could indicate that one or more software components have been built using a debug profile, instead of the release. Private debug databases can be embedded into software components by programming language tools.Prevalence in RubyGems community
2 packages
found in
Top 100
8 packages
found in
Top 1k
108 packages
found in
Top 10k
1.68k packages
in community
Next steps
To remediate this issue and remove private debugging information, refer to your programming language toolchain documentation.
Top behaviors
Contains URLs related to banking and monetary institutions.
network
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
8 packages
found in
Top 100
16 packages
found in
Top 1k
130 packages
found in
Top 10k
1.4k packages
in community
Contains URLs that link to interesting file formats.
network
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
53 packages
found in
Top 100
251 packages
found in
Top 1k
2185 packages
found in
Top 10k
23.19k packages
in community
Executes a file.
execution
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
1 packages
found in
Top 100
12 packages
found in
Top 1k
113 packages
found in
Top 10k
7.57k packages
in community
Compresses or decompresses data using the Deflate algorithm.
packer
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
10 packages
found in
Top 100
22 packages
found in
Top 1k
153 packages
found in
Top 10k
1.83k packages
in community
Contains IP addresses.
network
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
68 packages
found in
Top 100
564 packages
found in
Top 1k
3722 packages
found in
Top 10k
59.26k packages
in community
Top vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities found.