Top issues
Detected presence of software components distributed with copyleft licenses.
Causes risk: copyleft licensed components
licenses
Problem
Software license is a legal instrument that governs the use and distribution of software source code and its binary representation. Software publishers have the freedom to choose any commonly used or purposefully written license to publish their work under. While some licenses are liberal and allow almost any kind of distribution, with or without code modification, other licenses are more restrictive and impose rules for their inclusion in other software projects. Copyleft licenses in particular impose substantial restrictions on the licensee. They typically require that any derived works, and even software code that merely interacts with copyleft code, be licensed under the same license. Since copyleft licenses are commonly applied to open source code, their inclusion requires that the entire software package becomes open sourced. For commercial applications, this is typically undesirable. Therefore, the inclusion of copyleft code is commonly avoided or even prohibited by the organization policy.Prevalence in RubyGems community
7 packages
found in
Top 100
36 packages
found in
Top 1k
281 packages
found in
Top 10k
5393 packages
in community
Next steps
Confirm that the software package includes a copyleft component.
Investigate if the software publisher provides this component under a non-copyleft license.
Consider replacing the software component with an alternative that offers a license compatible with commercial use.
Problem
Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Open source communities depend on the work of thousands of software developers that volunteer their time to maintain software components. Software developers build up the reputation of their open source projects by developing in public. Modern source code repositories have many social features that allow software developers to handle bug reports, have discussions with their users, and convey reaching significant project milestones. It is uncommon to find open source projects that omit linking their component to a publicly accessible source code repository.Prevalence in RubyGems community
No prevalence information at this timeNext steps
Check the software component behaviors for anomalies.
Consider exploratory software component testing within a sandbox environment.
Consider replacing the software component with a more widely used alternative.
Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.
Top behaviors
Enumerates current user's home directory.
search
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
9 packages
found in
Top 100
24 packages
found in
Top 1k
203 packages
found in
Top 10k
2110 packages
in community
Evaluates an expression.
execution
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
62 packages
found in
Top 100
216 packages
found in
Top 1k
1359 packages
found in
Top 10k
14631 packages
in community
The software package does not declare any source code repository.
anomaly
Prevalence in RubyGems community
No behavior prevalence information at this timeExecutes commands in command line.
execution
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
47 packages
found in
Top 100
261 packages
found in
Top 1k
2039 packages
found in
Top 10k
24470 packages
in community
Queries the size of a file.
file
Prevalence in RubyGems community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
47 packages
found in
Top 100
188 packages
found in
Top 1k
1368 packages
found in
Top 10k
14094 packages
in community
Top vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities found.