Spectra Assure

failRisk: Vulnerabilities

Scanned:

aiXcoder Code Completer

Artifact:

latest

Top 10k

A free code completion tool powered by deep learning.

License: unknown

Published:

Publisher: aixcoder-plugin

Visit GitHub

See on Visual Studio Code

SAFE Assessment

Compliance

Licenses

No license compliance issues

Secrets

2 debugging symbols found

Security

Vulnerabilities

1 severe vulnerabilities exploited

Hardening

1 baseline mitigations missing

Threats

Tampering

No evidence of software tampering

Malware

No evidence of malware inclusion

List of software quality issues with the number of affected components.

Policies

Info

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known severe vulnerabilities. Available threat intelligence telemetry has confirmed that the reported high or critical severity vulnerabilities are actively being exploited by malicious actors.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

67 packages

found in

Top 100

548 packages

found in

Top 1k

3078 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.39k packages

in community

Next steps

We strongly advise updating the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as critical severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

60 packages

found in

Top 100

453 packages

found in

Top 1k

2271 packages

found in

Top 10k

12.07k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

We strongly advise updating the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Sensitive executable memory regions should be kept as read-only to protect the integrity of trusted execution code flow paths. Imported function addresses are pointers to the symbols that implement the application-required functionality. If those pointers are changed by malicious code, execution paths can be redirected to unintended locations. Most modern programming language toolchains protect those memory regions appropriately. These issues are commonly reported for outdated linkers and non-compliant executable packing solutions.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

20 packages

found in

Top 100

161 packages

found in

Top 1k

472 packages

found in

Top 10k

1.89k packages

in community

Next steps

Review the programming language linker options, and consider a build toolchain update.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as high severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

68 packages

found in

Top 100

555 packages

found in

Top 1k

3086 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.47k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

Update the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) are structured addresses that point to locations and assets on the internet. URLs allow software developers to build complex applications that exchange data with servers that can be hosted in multiple geographical regions. URLs can commonly be found embedded in documentation, configuration files, source code and compiled binaries. One or more embedded URLs were discovered to link to raw files hosted on GitHub. Attackers often abuse popular web services to host malicious payloads. Since code-sharing services URLs are typically allowed by security solutions, using them for payload delivery increases the odds that the malicious code will reach the user. While the presence of code-sharing service locations does not imply malicious intent, all of their uses in a software package should be documented and approved. An increasing number of software supply chain attacks in the open source space leverages the GitHub service to deliver malicious payloads.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

79 packages

found in

Top 100

622 packages

found in

Top 1k

4233 packages

found in

Top 10k

29.36k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider an alternative delivery mechanism for software packages.

Problem

Applications communicate with web services by exchanging HTTP requests. During software development, externally hosted services are used by developers to debug software quality issues relating to exchanging HTTP requests. Attackers commonly abuse tools designed for HTTP request inspection to monitor network traffic and extract sensitive information from the HTTP traffic. While the presence of domains related to HTTP inspection does not imply malicious intent, all of their uses in a software package should be documented and approved. Attackers might have purposely injected security testing tools in the software package to monitor the network traffic of the infected computer system. It is also possible that the software package has mistakenly included a part of its testing infrastructure during packaging.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

32 packages

found in

Top 100

236 packages

found in

Top 1k

1220 packages

found in

Top 10k

7.61k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider removing all references to flagged network locations.

Problem

ASLR (address-space layout randomization) is a mitigation technique that increases the difficulty of performing buffer-overflow attacks that require the attacker to know the address of the program in memory. This is done by loading the program at a randomly selected address in the process' address space. ASLR-enabled kernels can choose a random load address only for position-independent executables and code.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

26 packages

found in

Top 100

151 packages

found in

Top 1k

409 packages

found in

Top 10k

1.45k packages

in community

Next steps

To support ASLR, the program must be compiled as position-independent code. In most compilers, this is done by passing the corresponding position-independent flag, such as -fPIC for shared libraries or -fPIE for executables.

Problem

On Linux, external symbols are resolved via the procedure linkage table (PLT) and the global offset table (GOT). The global offset table is split into two tables - one for external data, and one for external functions. Without any protection, both are writable at runtime and thus leave the executable vulnerable to data overwrite attacks and pointer hijacking. Data overwrite attacks can be mitigated by using partial read-only relocations, while pointer hijacking can be mitigated with full read-only relocations. Both approaches have some drawbacks. Partial read-only relocations don't provide full protection, because the external function GOT remains writable. Full read-only relocations require that all external function symbols are resolved at load-time instead of during execution. This may increase loading time for large programs.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

18 packages

found in

Top 100

113 packages

found in

Top 1k

299 packages

found in

Top 10k

951 packages

in community

Next steps

In most cases, it's recommended to use full read-only relocations (in GCC: -Wl,-z,relro,-z,now).

If the executable load-time is an issue, you should use partial read-only relocations.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as medium severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

64 packages

found in

Top 100

530 packages

found in

Top 1k

2998 packages

found in

Top 10k

16.52k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

Update the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Software components contain executable code that performs actions implemented during its development. These actions are called behaviors. In the analysis report, behaviors are presented as human-readable descriptions that best match the underlying code intent. While most behaviors are benign, some are commonly abused by malicious software with the intent to cause harm. When a software package shares behavior traits with malicious software, it may become flagged by security solutions. Any detection from security solutions can cause friction for the end-users during software deployment. While the behavior is likely intended by the developer, there is a small chance this detection is true positive, and an early indication of a software supply chain attack.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

60 packages

found in

Top 100

434 packages

found in

Top 1k

2301 packages

found in

Top 10k

13.88k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software intent does not relate to the reported behavior, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

Did you know...

... that you can use ReversingLabs’ Spectra Assure platform to perform regular risk assessments of packages you develop in-house?

We recommend continuous software safeness monitoring through CI/CD integrations and pre-release/deployment checks. In addition to basic package information found on this page our platform offers rich reports for developers and DevSecOps that help them remediate all reported issues.

This website uses cookies to ensure the best website experience. By continuing to use this website you are giving your consent to cookies being used. Detailed information about our use of cookies is here.

List of software quality issues with the number of affected components.

Policies

Info

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

67 packages

found in

Top 100

548 packages

found in

Top 1k

3078 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.39k packages

in community

Next steps

We strongly advise updating the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as critical severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

60 packages

found in

Top 100

453 packages

found in

Top 1k

2271 packages

found in

Top 10k

12.07k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

We strongly advise updating the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

20 packages

found in

Top 100

161 packages

found in

Top 1k

472 packages

found in

Top 10k

1.89k packages

in community

Next steps

Review the programming language linker options, and consider a build toolchain update.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as high severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

68 packages

found in

Top 100

555 packages

found in

Top 1k

3086 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.47k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

Update the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

79 packages

found in

Top 100

622 packages

found in

Top 1k

4233 packages

found in

Top 10k

29.36k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider an alternative delivery mechanism for software packages.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

32 packages

found in

Top 100

236 packages

found in

Top 1k

1220 packages

found in

Top 10k

7.61k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider removing all references to flagged network locations.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

26 packages

found in

Top 100

151 packages

found in

Top 1k

409 packages

found in

Top 10k

1.45k packages

in community

Next steps

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

18 packages

found in

Top 100

113 packages

found in

Top 1k

299 packages

found in

Top 10k

951 packages

in community

Next steps

In most cases, it's recommended to use full read-only relocations (in GCC: -Wl,-z,relro,-z,now).

If the executable load-time is an issue, you should use partial read-only relocations.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as medium severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

64 packages

found in

Top 100

530 packages

found in

Top 1k

2998 packages

found in

Top 10k

16.52k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

Update the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

60 packages

found in

Top 100

434 packages

found in

Top 1k

2301 packages

found in

Top 10k

13.88k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software intent does not relate to the reported behavior, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

aiXcoder Code Completer

SAFE Assessment

Compliance

Security

Threats

SQ31102Detected presence of severe vulnerabilities with active exploitation.Causes risk: actively exploited vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31104Detected presence of critical severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: critical severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ14156Detected Windows executable files with imported functions susceptible to pointer hijacking.Causes risk: execution hijacking concernshardening

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31105Detected presence of high severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: high severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH17127Detected presence of files containing URLs that link to raw files on GitHub.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH17131Detected presence of files containing domains used for intercepting and inspecting HTTP requests.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ18111Detected Linux executable files that do not implement the ASLR vulnerability mitigation protection.Causes risk: baseline mitigations missinghardening

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ18112Detected Linux executable files that were compiled without any dynamic symbol hijacking protections.Causes risk: execution hijacking concernshardening

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31106Detected presence of medium severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: medium severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH15103Detected presence of files with behaviors commonly used by malicious software.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

Did you know...

SQ31102Detected presence of severe vulnerabilities with active exploitation.Causes risk: actively exploited vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31104Detected presence of critical severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: critical severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ14156Detected Windows executable files with imported functions susceptible to pointer hijacking.Causes risk: execution hijacking concernshardening

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31105Detected presence of high severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: high severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH17127Detected presence of files containing URLs that link to raw files on GitHub.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH17131Detected presence of files containing domains used for intercepting and inspecting HTTP requests.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ18111Detected Linux executable files that do not implement the ASLR vulnerability mitigation protection.Causes risk: baseline mitigations missinghardening

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ18112Detected Linux executable files that were compiled without any dynamic symbol hijacking protections.Causes risk: execution hijacking concernshardening

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31106Detected presence of medium severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: medium severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem