Spectra Assure
Community
Docs
failIncident: Malware
Scanned: 2 days ago

Telerik UI for ASP.NET Core Productivity Tools

Artifact:
Progress® Telerik® UI for ASP.NET Core Productivity Tools is a Visual Studio Code extension which includes multiple developer productivity features for scaffolding, code generation, configuration, reference, usage and sharing of code snippets of Telerik UI for ASP.NET Core components.
License: unknown
Published: about 1 month ago

Publisher: TelerikInc



SAFE Assessment

Compliance

Licenses
No license compliance issues
Secrets
2 debugging symbols found

Security

Vulnerabilities
No known vulnerabilities detected
Hardening
2 outdated toolchains detected

Threats

Tampering
No evidence of software tampering
Malware
1 suspicious components found

INCIDENTS FOR THIS VERSION:

malware
about 1 month agoReported By: ReversingLabs (Automated)
Learn more about malware detection

Popularity

27.13k
Total Installs
Contributor
Declared Dependencies
0
Dependents

Top issues

Problem

Third-party malware detection algorithms have determined that the software package contains one or more suspicious files. The detection was made by a hash-based file reputation lookup. This malware detection method is considered predictive, and can typically identify the malware family by name.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

3 packages
found in
Top 100
4 packages
found in
Top 1k
7 packages
found in
Top 10k
35 packages
in community

Next steps

Suspicious detections are a lower confidence detection, so you should first review them for malicious intent.
If the software intent does not relate to malicious behavior, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
Proceed with increased caution when using this software package.

Problem

Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) are structured addresses that point to locations and assets on the internet. URLs allow software developers to build complex applications that exchange data with servers that can be hosted in multiple geographical regions. URLs can commonly be found embedded in documentation, configuration files, source code and compiled binaries. One or more embedded URLs were discovered to link to raw files hosted on GitHub. Attackers often abuse popular web services to host malicious payloads. Since code-sharing services URLs are typically allowed by security solutions, using them for payload delivery increases the odds that the malicious code will reach the user. While the presence of code-sharing service locations does not imply malicious intent, all of their uses in a software package should be documented and approved. An increasing number of software supply chain attacks in the open source space leverages the GitHub service to deliver malicious payloads.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

78 packages
found in
Top 100
618 packages
found in
Top 1k
4203 packages
found in
Top 10k
27868 packages
in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.
If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.
Consider an alternative delivery mechanism for software packages.

Problem

Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) is a group of enhanced compile-time checks that report common coding mistakes as errors, preventing them from reaching production. These checks minimize the number of security issues by enforcing strict memory access checks. They also prevent the use of hard-to-secure string and memory manipulation functions. To prove the binary has been compiled with these checks enabled, the compiler emits a special debug object. Removing the debug table eliminates this proof. Therefore, this check only applies to binaries that still have their debug tables.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

38 packages
found in
Top 100
250 packages
found in
Top 1k
719 packages
found in
Top 10k
3448 packages
in community

Next steps

You should keep the debug table to prove that the SDL process has been followed.
To enable these checks, refer to your programming language toolchain documentation.
In Microsoft VisualStudio, you can enable this feature by setting the compiler option /SDL to ON.

Problem

Program database (PDB) files are typically only used during software development. They contain private debug symbols that make it significantly easier to reverse engineer a closed-source application. In some cases, having a program database file is equivalent to having access to the source code. Presence of program databases could indicate that one or more software components have been built using a debug profile, instead of the release.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

5 packages
found in
Top 100
23 packages
found in
Top 1k
64 packages
found in
Top 10k
189 packages
in community

Next steps

Private debug database files should not be embedded within executables, and you should remove them from the software package before releasing it.
The integrity verification of the embedded database files should not be done with insecure hashing algorithms. SHA1 and MD5 hashes should be deprecated throughout the application, and a more secure SHA256 algorithm should be used instead.

Problem

Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Open source communities depend on the work of thousands of software developers that volunteer their time to maintain software components. Software developers build up the reputation of their open source projects by developing in public. Modern source code repositories have many social features that allow software developers to handle bug reports, have discussions with their users, and convey reaching significant project milestones. It is uncommon to find open source projects that omit linking their component to a publicly accessible source code repository.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

57 packages
found in
Top 100
447 packages
found in
Top 1k
3421 packages
found in
Top 10k
56684 packages
in community

Next steps

Check the software component behaviors for anomalies.
Consider exploratory software component testing within a sandbox environment.
Consider replacing the software component with a more widely used alternative.
Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

Top behaviors

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
21 packages
found in
Top 100
135 packages
found in
Top 1k
319 packages
found in
Top 10k
1413 packages
in community

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
85 packages
found in
Top 100
673 packages
found in
Top 1k
4329 packages
found in
Top 10k
28768 packages
in community

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
81 packages
found in
Top 100
631 packages
found in
Top 1k
3887 packages
found in
Top 10k
24357 packages
in community

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
73 packages
found in
Top 100
573 packages
found in
Top 1k
3170 packages
found in
Top 10k
17492 packages
in community

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
78 packages
found in
Top 100
618 packages
found in
Top 1k
4203 packages
found in
Top 10k
27868 packages
in community

Top vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities found.