Spectra Assure

warningRisk: Hardening

Scanned:

@parcel/rust-linux-arm-gnueabihf

latest

License: Permissive (MIT)

Published:

Visit Github

See on npm

SAFE Assessment

Compliance

Licenses

No license compliance issues

Secrets

No sensitive information found

Security

Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities detected

Hardening

3 misconfigured toolchains detected

Threats

Tampering

No evidence of software tampering

Malware

No evidence of malware inclusion

List of software quality issues with the number of affected components.

Policies

Info

Count

Problem

Operating systems execute application code in multiple privilege access levels. Separation of privileges is designed to protect the stability and integrity of the operating system by shielding it from issues that the user run applications may cause. However, some users may need to interact with higher privilege parts of the operating system to accomplish specific tasks. For this purpose, operating systems provide facilities that users may leverage to temporarily elevate their running privileges. Users with higher privileges can run any application with the same privilege level as their own. Attackers often try to trick privileged users into running malicious code, enabling them to infect the operating system. While the presence of code that elevates user privileges does not necessarily imply malicious intent, all of its uses in a software package should be documented and approved. Only select applications should consider using functions that can elevate user privileges. One example of acceptable use for such functions is allowing the users to install software packages and updates.

Prevalence in npm community

0 packages

found in

Top 100

0 packages

found in

Top 1k

66 packages

found in

Top 10k

10036 packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.

Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1548 - Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

SQ18105

Detected Linux executable files compiled without any kind of buffer overrun protection while using banned string functions.

Causes risk: misconfigured toolchains detected

hardening

Problem

Buffer overrun protection on Linux is achieved in two ways. The most common solution is to use the stack canary (also called cookie). The stack canary is a special value written onto the stack that allows the operating system to detect and terminate the program if a stack overrun occurs. In most cases, compilers will apply the stack canary conservatively in order to avoid a negative performance impact. Therefore, stack canaries are often used together with another stack overrun mitigation - fortified functions. Fortified functions are usually wrappers around standard glibc functions (such as memcpy) which perform boundary checks either at compile time or run time to determine if a memory violation has occurred. The compiler needs additional context to generate such calls (for example, array size that needs to be known at compile time). Because of this, the compiler will virtually never substitute all viable functions with their fortified counterparts in complex programs. However, when combined with the stack canary, fortified functions provide a good measure of buffer overrun protection.

Prevalence in npm community

0 packages

found in

Top 100

1 packages

found in

Top 1k

62 packages

found in

Top 10k

7301 packages

in community

Next steps

Presence of unfortified string functions may indicate use of unsafe programming practices, and you should avoid it if possible.

In GCC, enable fortified functions with -fstack-protector and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 flag, while using at least -O1 optimization level.

SQ18106

Detected Linux executable files compiled without any kind of buffer overrun protection while using banned memory functions.

Causes risk: misconfigured toolchains detected

hardening

Problem

Prevalence in npm community

0 packages

found in

Top 100

1 packages

found in

Top 1k

84 packages

found in

Top 10k

11078 packages

in community

Next steps

Presence of unfortified memory functions may indicate use of unsafe programming practices, and you should avoid it if possible.

In GCC, enable fortified functions with -fstack-protector and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 flag, while using at least -O1 optimization level.

SQ18107

Detected Linux executable files compiled without any kind of buffer overrun protection while using banned input functions.

Causes risk: misconfigured toolchains detected

hardening

Problem

Prevalence in npm community

0 packages

found in

Top 100

1 packages

found in

Top 1k

71 packages

found in

Top 10k

9294 packages

in community

Next steps

Presence of some input functions may indicate use of unsafe programming practices, and you should avoid it if possible.

In GCC, enable fortified functions with -fstack-protector and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 flag, while using at least -O1 optimization level.

TH30107

Detected presence of software components that are rarely included by other public software packages.

hunting

Problem

Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Software developers publish components they have authored to public repositories. While a new software project is a welcome addition to the open source community. it is not always prudent to indiscriminately use the latest components when building a commercial application. Irrespective of the software quality, the danger of using components that are rarely used to build applications lies in the fact that the software component may contain novel, currently undetected malicious code. Therefore, it is prudent to review software component behaviors and even try out software component in a sandbox, an environment meant for testing untrusted code.

Prevalence in npm community

No prevalence information at this time

Next steps

Check the software component behaviors for anomalies.

Consider exploratory software component testing within a sandbox environment.

Consider replacing the software component with a more widely used alternative.

Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

Did you know...

... that you can use ReversingLabs’ Spectra Assure platform to perform regular risk assessments of packages you develop in-house?

We recommend continuous software safeness monitoring through CI/CD integrations and pre-release/deployment checks. In addition to basic package information found on this page our platform offers rich reports for developers and DevSecOps that help them remediate all reported issues.

List of software quality issues with the number of affected components.

Policies

Info

Count

Problem

Prevalence in npm community

0 packages

found in

Top 100

0 packages

found in

Top 1k

66 packages

found in

Top 10k

10036 packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.

Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1548 - Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

SQ18105

Detected Linux executable files compiled without any kind of buffer overrun protection while using banned string functions.

Causes risk: misconfigured toolchains detected

hardening

Problem

Prevalence in npm community

0 packages

found in

Top 100

1 packages

found in

Top 1k

62 packages

found in

Top 10k

7301 packages

in community

Next steps

Presence of unfortified string functions may indicate use of unsafe programming practices, and you should avoid it if possible.

In GCC, enable fortified functions with -fstack-protector and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 flag, while using at least -O1 optimization level.

SQ18106

Detected Linux executable files compiled without any kind of buffer overrun protection while using banned memory functions.

Causes risk: misconfigured toolchains detected

hardening

Problem

Prevalence in npm community

0 packages

found in

Top 100

1 packages

found in

Top 1k

84 packages

found in

Top 10k

11078 packages

in community

Next steps

Presence of unfortified memory functions may indicate use of unsafe programming practices, and you should avoid it if possible.

In GCC, enable fortified functions with -fstack-protector and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 flag, while using at least -O1 optimization level.

SQ18107

Detected Linux executable files compiled without any kind of buffer overrun protection while using banned input functions.

Causes risk: misconfigured toolchains detected

hardening

Problem

Prevalence in npm community

0 packages

found in

Top 100

1 packages

found in

Top 1k

71 packages

found in

Top 10k

9294 packages

in community

Next steps

Presence of some input functions may indicate use of unsafe programming practices, and you should avoid it if possible.

In GCC, enable fortified functions with -fstack-protector and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 flag, while using at least -O1 optimization level.

TH30107

Detected presence of software components that are rarely included by other public software packages.

hunting

Problem

Prevalence in npm community

No prevalence information at this time

Next steps

Check the software component behaviors for anomalies.

Consider exploratory software component testing within a sandbox environment.

Consider replacing the software component with a more widely used alternative.

Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.