failRisk: Vulnerabilities

Scanned:

TODO.md Kanban Board

Artifact:

latest

Coddx - a collection of tools that help developers program efficiently. Some useful features like: Kanban Board to manage project tasks in TODO.md, generating multiple files from templates quickly.

License: Permissive (MIT)

Published:

Publisher: coddx

Visit GitHub

See on Visual Studio Code

SAFE Assessment

Compliance

Licenses

No license compliance issues

Secrets

No sensitive information found

Security

Vulnerabilities

10 severe vulnerabilities exploited

Hardening

No application hardening issues

Threats

Tampering

No evidence of software tampering

Malware

No evidence of malware inclusion

List of software quality issues with the number of affected components.

Policies

Info

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known severe vulnerabilities. Available threat intelligence telemetry has confirmed that the reported high or critical severity vulnerabilities are actively being exploited by malicious actors.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

67 packages

found in

Top 100

548 packages

found in

Top 1k

3078 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.39k packages

in community

Next steps

We strongly advise updating the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as critical severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

60 packages

found in

Top 100

453 packages

found in

Top 1k

2271 packages

found in

Top 10k

12.07k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

We strongly advise updating the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as high severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

68 packages

found in

Top 100

555 packages

found in

Top 1k

3086 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.47k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

Update the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Operating systems provide utilities that allow the users to have their data automatically backed up. Backups provide resilience against incidents of material data loss through hardware corruption, or unintended file deletion. Financially motivated attackers often aim to disable backup systems and delete all instances of previously backed up data. Malicious code that typically exhibits these behavior traits is commonly referred to as ransomware. Ransomware aims to encrypt all user-generated data asking for monetary payment in return for providing the access back to its victims. While the presence of code that disables backup systems does not necessarily imply malicious intent, all of its uses in a software package should be documented and approved. Only select applications should consider using functions that can temporarily disable backups. One example of acceptable use for such functions is allowing the user to reduce their storage footprint in case data backups are no longer needed.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

0 packages

found in

Top 100

2 packages

found in

Top 1k

16 packages

found in

Top 10k

43 packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.

Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1490 - Inhibit System Recovery.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

Problem

Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) are structured addresses that point to locations and assets on the internet. URLs allow software developers to build complex applications that exchange data with servers that can be hosted in multiple geographical regions. URLs can commonly be found embedded in documentation, configuration files, source code and compiled binaries. One or more embedded URLs were discovered to link to raw files hosted on GitHub. Attackers often abuse popular web services to host malicious payloads. Since code-sharing services URLs are typically allowed by security solutions, using them for payload delivery increases the odds that the malicious code will reach the user. While the presence of code-sharing service locations does not imply malicious intent, all of their uses in a software package should be documented and approved. An increasing number of software supply chain attacks in the open source space leverages the GitHub service to deliver malicious payloads.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

79 packages

found in

Top 100

622 packages

found in

Top 1k

4233 packages

found in

Top 10k

29.36k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider an alternative delivery mechanism for software packages.

Problem

Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Software developers publish components they have authored to public repositories. While a new software project is a welcome addition to the open source community, it is not always prudent to indiscriminately use the latest components when building a commercial application. Irrespective of the software quality, the danger of being the first to try out a new project lies in the fact that the software component may contain novel, currently undetected malicious code. Therefore, it is prudent to review software component behaviors and even try out software component in a sandbox, an environment meant for testing untrusted code.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

25 packages

found in

Top 100

151 packages

found in

Top 1k

793 packages

found in

Top 10k

3.71k packages

in community

Next steps

Check the software component behaviors for anomalies.

Consider exploratory software component testing within a sandbox environment.

Consider replacing the software component with a more widely used alternative.

Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

Problem

Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Each of these components can have dozens, or even hundreds, of its own dependencies. When building applications, software developers download and install components from public repositories. For components to work properly, all of their dependencies also need to be installed. Some package repositories, like Node Package Manager (NPM), allow components to declare dependencies that are hosted remotely. Such dependencies are automatically downloaded from a specified location during software component installation. Since remotely hosted dependencies are not immutable, that enables a threat actor to change the dependency contents even after a component was published and vetted by security solutions. It is uncommon to find open source components that use remotely hosted dependencies residing outside the official project source code repository.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

36 packages

found in

Top 100

227 packages

found in

Top 1k

1175 packages

found in

Top 10k

5.7k packages

in community

Next steps

Review software component remote dependency locations.

If the software component resolves dependencies from unusual locations, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

Consider vendoring the software component with all of its dependencies.

Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as medium severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

64 packages

found in

Top 100

530 packages

found in

Top 1k

2998 packages

found in

Top 10k

16.52k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

Update the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Software components contain executable code that performs actions implemented during its development. These actions are called behaviors. In the analysis report, behaviors are presented as human-readable descriptions that best match the underlying code intent. While most behaviors are benign, some are commonly abused by malicious software with the intent to cause harm. When a software package shares behavior traits with malicious software, it may become flagged by security solutions. Any detection from security solutions can cause friction for the end-users during software deployment. While the behavior is likely intended by the developer, there is a small chance this detection is true positive, and an early indication of a software supply chain attack.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

60 packages

found in

Top 100

434 packages

found in

Top 1k

2301 packages

found in

Top 10k

13.88k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software intent does not relate to the reported behavior, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

Problem

Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) are structured addresses that point to locations and assets on the internet. URLs allow software developers to build complex applications that exchange data with servers that can be hosted in multiple geographical regions. URLs can commonly be found embedded in documentation, configuration files, source code and compiled binaries. Top-level domains (TLD) are a part of the Domain Name System (DNS), and are used to lookup an Internet Protocol (IP) address of a requested website. There are a few different types of top-level domains. Generic, sponsored and country-code TLDs are generally accessible to the public. Registrars that govern the assignment of domain names within the TLD may choose to sell specific domain names to an interested party. However, some registrars are known to have less strict rules for assigning domain names. Attackers often abuse gaps in governance and actively seek to register their malicious domains in such TLDs. This issue is raised for all domains registered within TLDs that harbor an excessive number of malicious sites. While the presence of suspicious TLDs does not imply malicious intent, all of its uses in a software package should be documented and approved.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

44 packages

found in

Top 100

321 packages

found in

Top 1k

1549 packages

found in

Top 10k

16.36k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider changing the top-level domain to avoid being flagged by security solutions.

Did you know...

... that you can use ReversingLabs’ Spectra Assure platform to perform regular risk assessments of packages you develop in-house?

We recommend continuous software safeness monitoring through CI/CD integrations and pre-release/deployment checks. In addition to basic package information found on this page our platform offers rich reports for developers and DevSecOps that help them remediate all reported issues.

This website uses cookies to ensure the best website experience. By continuing to use this website you are giving your consent to cookies being used. Detailed information about our use of cookies is here.

List of software quality issues with the number of affected components.

Policies

Info

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

67 packages

found in

Top 100

548 packages

found in

Top 1k

3078 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.39k packages

in community

Next steps

We strongly advise updating the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as critical severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

60 packages

found in

Top 100

453 packages

found in

Top 1k

2271 packages

found in

Top 10k

12.07k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

We strongly advise updating the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as high severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

68 packages

found in

Top 100

555 packages

found in

Top 1k

3086 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.47k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

Update the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

0 packages

found in

Top 100

2 packages

found in

Top 1k

16 packages

found in

Top 10k

43 packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.

Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1490 - Inhibit System Recovery.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

79 packages

found in

Top 100

622 packages

found in

Top 1k

4233 packages

found in

Top 10k

29.36k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider an alternative delivery mechanism for software packages.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

25 packages

found in

Top 100

151 packages

found in

Top 1k

793 packages

found in

Top 10k

3.71k packages

in community

Next steps

Check the software component behaviors for anomalies.

Consider exploratory software component testing within a sandbox environment.

Consider replacing the software component with a more widely used alternative.

Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

Problem

Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Each of these components can have dozens, or even hundreds, of its own dependencies. When building applications, software developers download and install components from public repositories. For components to work properly, all of their dependencies also need to be installed. Some package repositories, like Node Package Manager (NPM), allow components to declare dependencies that are hosted remotely. Such dependencies are automatically downloaded from a specified location during software component installation. Since remotely hosted dependencies are not immutable, that enables a threat actor to change the dependency contents even after a component was published and vetted by security solutions. It is uncommon to find open source components that use remotely hosted dependencies residing outside the official project source code repository.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

36 packages

found in

Top 100

227 packages

found in

Top 1k

1175 packages

found in

Top 10k

5.7k packages

in community

Next steps

Review software component remote dependency locations.

If the software component resolves dependencies from unusual locations, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

Consider vendoring the software component with all of its dependencies.

Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as medium severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

64 packages

found in

Top 100

530 packages

found in

Top 1k

2998 packages

found in

Top 10k

16.52k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

Update the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

60 packages

found in

Top 100

434 packages

found in

Top 1k

2301 packages

found in

Top 10k

13.88k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software intent does not relate to the reported behavior, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

Problem

Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) are structured addresses that point to locations and assets on the internet. URLs allow software developers to build complex applications that exchange data with servers that can be hosted in multiple geographical regions. URLs can commonly be found embedded in documentation, configuration files, source code and compiled binaries. Top-level domains (TLD) are a part of the Domain Name System (DNS), and are used to lookup an Internet Protocol (IP) address of a requested website. There are a few different types of top-level domains. Generic, sponsored and country-code TLDs are generally accessible to the public. Registrars that govern the assignment of domain names within the TLD may choose to sell specific domain names to an interested party. However, some registrars are known to have less strict rules for assigning domain names. Attackers often abuse gaps in governance and actively seek to register their malicious domains in such TLDs. This issue is raised for all domains registered within TLDs that harbor an excessive number of malicious sites. While the presence of suspicious TLDs does not imply malicious intent, all of its uses in a software package should be documented and approved.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

44 packages

found in

Top 100

321 packages

found in

Top 1k

1549 packages

found in

Top 10k

16.36k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider changing the top-level domain to avoid being flagged by security solutions.

TODO.md Kanban Board

SAFE Assessment

Compliance

Security

Threats

SQ31102Detected presence of severe vulnerabilities with active exploitation.Causes risk: actively exploited vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31104Detected presence of critical severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: critical severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31105Detected presence of high severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: high severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH16121Detected presence of software components that can tamper with the system backup functions.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH17127Detected presence of files containing URLs that link to raw files on GitHub.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH30106Detected presence of software components that have low popularity or number of downloads.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH30109Detected presence of software components with dependencies that are hosted outside the official project repository.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31106Detected presence of medium severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: medium severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH15103Detected presence of files with behaviors commonly used by malicious software.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH17118Detected presence of files containing URLs that use suspicious top-level domains.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

Did you know...

SQ31102Detected presence of severe vulnerabilities with active exploitation.Causes risk: actively exploited vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31104Detected presence of critical severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: critical severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31105Detected presence of high severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: high severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH16121Detected presence of software components that can tamper with the system backup functions.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH17127Detected presence of files containing URLs that link to raw files on GitHub.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH30106Detected presence of software components that have low popularity or number of downloads.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH30109Detected presence of software components with dependencies that are hosted outside the official project repository.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31106Detected presence of medium severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: medium severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH15103Detected presence of files with behaviors commonly used by malicious software.hunting

Problem