Spectra Assure

failRisk: Vulnerabilities

Scanned:

Ren'Py Launch and Sync

Artifact:

Top 10k

Keep Ren'Py in sync with your code

License: unknown

Published:

Publisher: PaisleySoftworks

Visit GitHub

See on Visual Studio Code

SAFE Assessment

Compliance

Licenses

No license compliance issues

Secrets

2 debugging symbols found

Security

Vulnerabilities

1 severe vulnerabilities exploited

Hardening

2 misconfigured toolchains detected

Threats

Tampering

No evidence of software tampering

Malware

No evidence of malware inclusion

List of software quality issues with the number of affected components.

Policies

Info

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known severe vulnerabilities. Available threat intelligence telemetry has confirmed that the reported high or critical severity vulnerabilities are actively being exploited by malicious actors.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

67 packages

found in

Top 100

548 packages

found in

Top 1k

3078 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.39k packages

in community

Next steps

We strongly advise updating the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as high severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

68 packages

found in

Top 100

555 packages

found in

Top 1k

3086 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.47k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

Update the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) is a group of enhanced compile-time checks that report common coding mistakes as errors, preventing them from reaching production. These checks minimize the number of security issues by enforcing strict memory access checks. They also prevent the use of hard-to-secure string and memory manipulation functions. To prove the binary has been compiled with these checks enabled, the compiler emits a special debug object. Removing the debug table eliminates this proof. Therefore, this check only applies to binaries that still have their debug tables.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

43 packages

found in

Top 100

257 packages

found in

Top 1k

754 packages

found in

Top 10k

3.7k packages

in community

Next steps

You should keep the debug table to prove that the SDL process has been followed.

To enable these checks, refer to your programming language toolchain documentation.

In Microsoft VisualStudio, you can enable this feature by setting the compiler option /SDL to ON.

Problem

Program database (PDB) files are typically only used during software development. They contain private debug symbols that make it significantly easier to reverse engineer a closed source application. In some cases, having a program database file is equivalent to having access to the source code. Presence of program databases could indicate that one or more software components have been built using a debug profile, instead of the release.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

8 packages

found in

Top 100

49 packages

found in

Top 1k

130 packages

found in

Top 10k

479 packages

in community

Next steps

Remove private debug database files from the software package before you release it.

Problem

Software components contain executable code that performs actions implemented during its development. These actions are called behaviors. In the analysis report, behaviors are presented as human-readable descriptions that best match the underlying code intent. While most behaviors are benign, some are commonly abused by malicious software with the intent to cause harm. When a software package shares behavior traits with malicious software, it may become flagged by security solutions. Any detection from security solutions can cause friction for the end-users during software deployment. While the behavior is likely intended by the developer, there is a small chance this detection is true positive, and an early indication of a software supply chain attack.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

60 packages

found in

Top 100

434 packages

found in

Top 1k

2301 packages

found in

Top 10k

13.88k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software intent does not relate to the reported behavior, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

Problem

Control Flow Guard (CFG/CFI) protects the code flow integrity by ensuring that dynamic calls are made only to vetted functions. Trusted execution paths rely on the ability of the operating system to build a list of valid function targets. Certain functions can intentionally be disallowed to prevent malicious code from deactivating vulnerability mitigation features. A list of such invalid function targets can include publicly exported symbols. Applications that enhance control flow integrity through export suppression rely on libraries to mark their publicly visible symbols as suppressed. This is done for all symbols that are considered to be sensitive functions, and to which access should be restricted. It is considered dangerous to mix applications that perform export suppression with libraries that do not.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

36 packages

found in

Top 100

208 packages

found in

Top 1k

646 packages

found in

Top 10k

3.22k packages

in community

Next steps

To enable this mitigation on library code, refer to your programming language toolchain documentation.

In Microsoft VisualStudio, you can enable CFG mitigation by passing the /guard:cf parameter to the compiler and linker.

Problem

Control Flow Guard (CFG/CFI) protects the code flow integrity by ensuring that indirect calls are made only to vetted functions. This mitigation protects dynamically resolved function targets by instrumenting the code responsible for transferring execution control. Higher-level programming languages implement structured exception handling by managing their own code flow execution paths. As such, they are subject to code flow hijacking during runtime. Language-specific exception handling mitigation enforces execution integrity by instrumenting calls to manage execution context switching. Any deviation from the known and trusted code flow paths will cause the application to terminate. This makes malicious code less likely to execute.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

47 packages

found in

Top 100

286 packages

found in

Top 1k

912 packages

found in

Top 10k

4.37k packages

in community

Next steps

It's highly recommended to enable this option for all software components used at security boundaries, or those that process user controlled inputs.

To enable this mitigation, refer to your programming language toolchain documentation.

In Microsoft VisualStudio, you can enable CFG mitigation by passing the /guard:cf parameter to the compiler and linker.

Problem

Control Flow Guard (CFG/CFI) protects the code flow integrity by ensuring that indirect calls are made only to vetted functions. This mitigation protects dynamically resolved function targets by instrumenting the code responsible for transferring execution control. Function pointers that get resolved through import and delayed import address tables do not need to be monitored during application runtime. Instead, it is expected that modern programming language toolchains place those pointers in read-only memory locations. However, the delayed import functions are resolved as they are needed during runtime. To ensure the function pointers remain read-only, the operating system must be made aware if it is safe to re-protect the memory pages that hold them. Modern toolchains typically separate import data from other application regions for this very reason.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

29 packages

found in

Top 100

152 packages

found in

Top 1k

499 packages

found in

Top 10k

2.4k packages

in community

Next steps

To enable this mitigation, refer to your programming language toolchain documentation.

In Microsoft VisualStudio, you can enable CFG mitigation by passing the /guard:cf parameter to the compiler and linker.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as low severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

52 packages

found in

Top 100

388 packages

found in

Top 1k

2065 packages

found in

Top 10k

10.51k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

Update the component to the latest version.

Lower severity vulnerabilities can be resolved with less urgency, but you should still make a plan to do so.

Problem

Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Each of these components can have dozens, or even hundreds, of its own dependencies. When building applications, software developers download and install components from public repositories. For components to work properly, all of their dependencies also need to be installed. Some package repositories, like Node Package Manager (NPM), allow components to declare dependencies that are hosted remotely. Such dependencies are automatically downloaded from a specified location during software component installation. Since remotely hosted dependencies are not immutable, that enables a threat actor to change the dependency contents even after a component was published and vetted by security solutions. It is uncommon to find open source components that use remotely hosted source dependencies.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

45 packages

found in

Top 100

288 packages

found in

Top 1k

1604 packages

found in

Top 10k

8.43k packages

in community

Next steps

Review software component remote dependency locations.

If the software component resolves dependencies from unusual locations, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

Consider vendoring the software component with all of its dependencies.

Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

Did you know...

... that you can use ReversingLabs’ Spectra Assure platform to perform regular risk assessments of packages you develop in-house?

We recommend continuous software safeness monitoring through CI/CD integrations and pre-release/deployment checks. In addition to basic package information found on this page our platform offers rich reports for developers and DevSecOps that help them remediate all reported issues.

This website uses cookies to ensure the best website experience. By continuing to use this website you are giving your consent to cookies being used. Detailed information about our use of cookies is here.

List of software quality issues with the number of affected components.

Policies

Info

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

67 packages

found in

Top 100

548 packages

found in

Top 1k

3078 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.39k packages

in community

Next steps

We strongly advise updating the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as high severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

68 packages

found in

Top 100

555 packages

found in

Top 1k

3086 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.47k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

Update the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

43 packages

found in

Top 100

257 packages

found in

Top 1k

754 packages

found in

Top 10k

3.7k packages

in community

Next steps

You should keep the debug table to prove that the SDL process has been followed.

To enable these checks, refer to your programming language toolchain documentation.

In Microsoft VisualStudio, you can enable this feature by setting the compiler option /SDL to ON.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

8 packages

found in

Top 100

49 packages

found in

Top 1k

130 packages

found in

Top 10k

479 packages

in community

Next steps

Remove private debug database files from the software package before you release it.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

60 packages

found in

Top 100

434 packages

found in

Top 1k

2301 packages

found in

Top 10k

13.88k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software intent does not relate to the reported behavior, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

36 packages

found in

Top 100

208 packages

found in

Top 1k

646 packages

found in

Top 10k

3.22k packages

in community

Next steps

To enable this mitigation on library code, refer to your programming language toolchain documentation.

In Microsoft VisualStudio, you can enable CFG mitigation by passing the /guard:cf parameter to the compiler and linker.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

47 packages

found in

Top 100

286 packages

found in

Top 1k

912 packages

found in

Top 10k

4.37k packages

in community

Next steps

It's highly recommended to enable this option for all software components used at security boundaries, or those that process user controlled inputs.

To enable this mitigation, refer to your programming language toolchain documentation.

In Microsoft VisualStudio, you can enable CFG mitigation by passing the /guard:cf parameter to the compiler and linker.

Problem

Control Flow Guard (CFG/CFI) protects the code flow integrity by ensuring that indirect calls are made only to vetted functions. This mitigation protects dynamically resolved function targets by instrumenting the code responsible for transferring execution control. Function pointers that get resolved through import and delayed import address tables do not need to be monitored during application runtime. Instead, it is expected that modern programming language toolchains place those pointers in read-only memory locations. However, the delayed import functions are resolved as they are needed during runtime. To ensure the function pointers remain read-only, the operating system must be made aware if it is safe to re-protect the memory pages that hold them. Modern toolchains typically separate import data from other application regions for this very reason.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

29 packages

found in

Top 100

152 packages

found in

Top 1k

499 packages

found in

Top 10k

2.4k packages

in community

Next steps

To enable this mitigation, refer to your programming language toolchain documentation.

In Microsoft VisualStudio, you can enable CFG mitigation by passing the /guard:cf parameter to the compiler and linker.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as low severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

52 packages

found in

Top 100

388 packages

found in

Top 1k

2065 packages

found in

Top 10k

10.51k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

Update the component to the latest version.

Lower severity vulnerabilities can be resolved with less urgency, but you should still make a plan to do so.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

45 packages

found in

Top 100

288 packages

found in

Top 1k

1604 packages

found in

Top 10k

8.43k packages

in community

Next steps

Review software component remote dependency locations.

If the software component resolves dependencies from unusual locations, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

Consider vendoring the software component with all of its dependencies.

Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

Ren'Py Launch and Sync

SAFE Assessment

Compliance

Security

Threats

SQ31102Detected presence of severe vulnerabilities with active exploitation.Causes risk: actively exploited vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31105Detected presence of high severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: high severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ14138Detected Windows executable files that were compiled without following the recommended SDL process.Causes risk: misconfigured toolchains detectedhardening

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ34202Detected presence of private debug database files.Causes risk: debugging symbols foundsecrets

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH15103Detected presence of files with behaviors commonly used by malicious software.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ14125Detected Windows shared library files that do not suppress exports which reduces CFG vulnerability mitigation protection effectiveness.Causes risk: low priority mitigations absenthardening

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ14127Detected Windows executable files that do not implement long jump control flow vulnerability mitigation protection.Causes risk: low priority mitigations absenthardening

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ14128Detected Windows executable files that do not implement delayed import function hijacking mitigation protection.Causes risk: low priority mitigations absenthardening

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31107Detected presence of low severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: low severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH30111Detected presence of software components with remotely hosted source dependencies.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

Did you know...

SQ31102Detected presence of severe vulnerabilities with active exploitation.Causes risk: actively exploited vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31105Detected presence of high severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: high severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ14138Detected Windows executable files that were compiled without following the recommended SDL process.Causes risk: misconfigured toolchains detectedhardening

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ34202Detected presence of private debug database files.Causes risk: debugging symbols foundsecrets

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH15103Detected presence of files with behaviors commonly used by malicious software.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ14125Detected Windows shared library files that do not suppress exports which reduces CFG vulnerability mitigation protection effectiveness.Causes risk: low priority mitigations absenthardening

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ14127Detected Windows executable files that do not implement long jump control flow vulnerability mitigation protection.Causes risk: low priority mitigations absenthardening

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ14128Detected Windows executable files that do not implement delayed import function hijacking mitigation protection.Causes risk: low priority mitigations absenthardening

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31107Detected presence of low severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: low severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem