Spectra Assure

warningRisk: Tampering

Scanned:

rust-analyzer

Artifact:

Rust language support for Visual Studio Code

License: unknown

New!

Published:

Publisher: rust-lang

See on Visual Studio Code

SAFE Assessment

Compliance

Licenses

No license compliance issues

Secrets

1 debugging symbols found

Security

Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities detected

Hardening

1 low priority mitigations absent

Threats

Tampering

1 components with malware history

Malware

No evidence of malware inclusion

IMPORTANT: This package had 3 malicious incidents in the last 2 years

Latest malware incident detected:

Version: 0.4.2695

INCIDENTS FOR THIS VERSION:

Did you know...

... that you can use ReversingLabs’ Spectra Assure platform to perform regular risk assessments of packages you develop in-house?

We recommend continuous software safeness monitoring through CI/CD integrations and pre-release/deployment checks. In addition to basic package information found on this page our platform offers rich reports for developers and DevSecOps that help them remediate all reported issues.

List of software quality issues with the number of affected components.

Policies

Info

Count

Category

Detected presence of files containing URLs that link to raw files on GitHub.

1

hunting

Problem

Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) are structured addresses that point to locations and assets on the internet. URLs allow software developers to build complex applications that exchange data with servers that can be hosted in multiple geographical regions. URLs can commonly be found embedded in documentation, configuration files, source code and compiled binaries. One or more embedded URLs were discovered to link to raw files hosted on GitHub. Attackers often abuse popular web services to host malicious payloads. Since code-sharing services URLs are typically allowed by security solutions, using them for payload delivery increases the odds that the malicious code will reach the user. While the presence of code-sharing service locations does not imply malicious intent, all of their uses in a software package should be documented and approved. An increasing number of software supply chain attacks in the open source space leverages the GitHub service to deliver malicious payloads.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

78 packages

found in

Top 100

618 packages

found in

Top 1k

4203 packages

found in

Top 10k

27868 packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider an alternative delivery mechanism for software packages.

Detected presence of software components that had a recent malware or tampering incident.

Causes risk: components with malware history

1

hunting

Problem

Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Software developers publish components they have authored to public repositories. Some open source projects have a history of security lapses that culminated with a publication of one or more malicious component versions. To ensure that repeated supply chain incidents do not occur, the open source project should be closely monitored for up to two years. All software package versions that are published within two years of the malware incident will convey a warning about the history of security incidents tied to the open source project.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

24 packages

found in

Top 100

102 packages

found in

Top 1k

326 packages

found in

Top 10k

1057 packages

in community

Next steps

Inspect behaviors exhibited by the detected software components.

If the software behaviors differ from expected, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

Revise the use of components that raise these alarms. If you can't deprecate those components, make sure that their versions are pinned.

Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

Detected presence of private debug database files.

Causes risk: debugging symbols found

1

secrets

Problem

Program database (PDB) files are typically only used during software development. They contain private debug symbols that make it significantly easier to reverse engineer a closed source application. In some cases, having a program database file is equivalent to having access to the source code. Presence of program databases could indicate that one or more software components have been built using a debug profile, instead of the release.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

8 packages

found in

Top 100

46 packages

found in

Top 1k

126 packages

found in

Top 10k

455 packages

in community

Next steps

Remove private debug database files from the software package before you release it.

Detected Windows executable files that do not implement long jump control flow vulnerability mitigation protection.

Causes risk: low priority mitigations absent

1

hardening

Problem

Control Flow Guard (CFG/CFI) protects the code flow integrity by ensuring that indirect calls are made only to vetted functions. This mitigation protects dynamically resolved function targets by instrumenting the code responsible for transferring execution control. Higher-level programming languages implement structured exception handling by managing their own code flow execution paths. As such, they are subject to code flow hijacking during runtime. Language-specific exception handling mitigation enforces execution integrity by instrumenting calls to manage execution context switching. Any deviation from the known and trusted code flow paths will cause the application to terminate. This makes malicious code less likely to execute.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

43 packages

found in

Top 100

278 packages

found in

Top 1k

880 packages

found in

Top 10k

4106 packages

in community

Next steps

It's highly recommended to enable this option for all software components used at security boundaries, or those that process user controlled inputs.

To enable this mitigation, refer to your programming language toolchain documentation.

In Microsoft VisualStudio, you can enable CFG mitigation by passing the /guard:cf parameter to the compiler and linker.

Detected presence of files containing URLs that use non-standard ports.

1

hunting

Problem

Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) are structured addresses that point to locations and assets on the internet. URLs allow software developers to build complex applications that exchange data with servers that can be hosted in multiple geographical regions. URLs can commonly be found embedded in documentation, configuration files, source code and compiled binaries. A port number is associated with a network address of a host, such as an IP address, and the type of network protocol used for communication. Within URLs, the ports are optional. Ports can be specified in a URL immediately following the domain name. Each network protocol, or schema, has a set of standard ports on which the service operates. This issue is raised when a mismatch between a network protocol and its expected port number is detected. While the presence of non-standard ports does not imply malicious intent, all of their uses in a software package should be documented and approved.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

78 packages

found in

Top 100

551 packages

found in

Top 1k

2844 packages

found in

Top 10k

16607 packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider changing the port to one that is standard for the networking protocol.