Spectra Assure
Community
Docs
warningRisk: Secrets
Scanned: 7 days ago

nvidia-nccl-cu12

Artifact:
latest
Top 1k
NVIDIA Collective Communication Library (NCCL) Runtime
License: unknown
Published: 7 days ago



SAFE Assessment

Compliance

Licenses
No license compliance issues
Secrets
2 debugging symbols found

Security

Vulnerabilities
No known vulnerabilities detected
Hardening
1 execution hijacking concerns

Threats

Tampering
No evidence of software tampering
Malware
No evidence of malware inclusion

Popularity

523.26M
Total Downloads
Contributors
Declared Dependencies
121
Dependents

Top issues

Problem

Buffer overrun protection on Linux is achieved in two ways. The most common solution is to use the stack canary (also called cookie). The stack canary is a special value written onto the stack that allows the operating system to detect and terminate the program if a stack overrun occurs. In most cases, compilers will apply the stack canary conservatively in order to avoid a negative performance impact. Therefore, stack canaries are often used together with another stack overrun mitigation - fortified functions. Fortified functions are usually wrappers around standard glibc functions (such as memcpy) which perform boundary checks either at compile time or run time to determine if a memory violation has occurred. The compiler needs additional context to generate such calls (for example, array size that needs to be known at compile time). Because of this, the compiler will virtually never substitute all viable functions with their fortified counterparts in complex programs. However, when combined with the stack canary, fortified functions provide a good measure of buffer overrun protection.

Prevalence in PyPI community

13 packages
found in
Top 100
74 packages
found in
Top 1k
456 packages
found in
Top 10k
7612 packages
in community

Next steps

Presence of unfortified string functions may indicate use of unsafe programming practices, and you should avoid it if possible.
In GCC, enable fortified functions with -fstack-protector and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 flag, while using at least -O1 optimization level.

Problem

Buffer overrun protection on Linux is achieved in two ways. The most common solution is to use the stack canary (also called cookie). The stack canary is a special value written onto the stack that allows the operating system to detect and terminate the program if a stack overrun occurs. In most cases, compilers will apply the stack canary conservatively in order to avoid a negative performance impact. Therefore, stack canaries are often used together with another stack overrun mitigation - fortified functions. Fortified functions are usually wrappers around standard glibc functions (such as memcpy) which perform boundary checks either at compile time or run time to determine if a memory violation has occurred. The compiler needs additional context to generate such calls (for example, array size that needs to be known at compile time). Because of this, the compiler will virtually never substitute all viable functions with their fortified counterparts in complex programs. However, when combined with the stack canary, fortified functions provide a good measure of buffer overrun protection.

Prevalence in PyPI community

18 packages
found in
Top 100
112 packages
found in
Top 1k
646 packages
found in
Top 10k
13062 packages
in community

Next steps

Presence of unfortified memory functions may indicate use of unsafe programming practices, and you should avoid it if possible.
In GCC, enable fortified functions with -fstack-protector and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 flag, while using at least -O1 optimization level.

Problem

Buffer overrun protection on Linux is achieved in two ways. The most common solution is to use the stack canary (also called cookie). The stack canary is a special value written onto the stack that allows the operating system to detect and terminate the program if a stack overrun occurs. In most cases, compilers will apply the stack canary conservatively in order to avoid a negative performance impact. Therefore, stack canaries are often used together with another stack overrun mitigation - fortified functions. Fortified functions are usually wrappers around standard glibc functions (such as memcpy) which perform boundary checks either at compile time or run time to determine if a memory violation has occurred. The compiler needs additional context to generate such calls (for example, array size that needs to be known at compile time). Because of this, the compiler will virtually never substitute all viable functions with their fortified counterparts in complex programs. However, when combined with the stack canary, fortified functions provide a good measure of buffer overrun protection.

Prevalence in PyPI community

9 packages
found in
Top 100
58 packages
found in
Top 1k
349 packages
found in
Top 10k
8260 packages
in community

Next steps

Presence of some input functions may indicate use of unsafe programming practices, and you should avoid it if possible.
In GCC, enable fortified functions with -fstack-protector and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 flag, while using at least -O1 optimization level.

Problem

Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Open source communities depend on the work of thousands of software developers that volunteer their time to maintain software components. Software developers build up the reputation of their open source projects by developing in public. Modern source code repositories have many social features that allow software developers to handle bug reports, have discussions with their users, and convey reaching significant project milestones. It is uncommon to find open source projects that omit linking their component to a publicly accessible source code repository.

Prevalence in PyPI community

No prevalence information at this time

Next steps

Check the software component behaviors for anomalies.
Consider exploratory software component testing within a sandbox environment.
Consider replacing the software component with a more widely used alternative.
Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

Problem

On Linux, external symbols are resolved via the procedure linkage table (PLT) and the global offset table (GOT). Without any protection, both are writable at runtime and thus leave the executable vulnerable to pointer hijacking - an attack where the function address is overwritten with an address of a malicious function. Pointer hijacking can be mitigated by using full read-only relocations, which instruct the compiler to unify global offset tables into a single read-only table. This requires that all external function symbols are resolved at load-time instead of during execution, and may increase loading time for large programs.

Prevalence in PyPI community

22 packages
found in
Top 100
122 packages
found in
Top 1k
767 packages
found in
Top 10k
16246 packages
in community

Next steps

In most cases, it's recommended to use full read-only relocations (in GCC: -Wl,-z,relro,-z,now).
If the executable load-time is an issue, you should use partial read-only relocations.

Top behaviors

Prevalence in PyPI community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
11 packages
found in
Top 100
73 packages
found in
Top 1k
368 packages
found in
Top 10k
8619 packages
in community

Prevalence in PyPI community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
3 packages
found in
Top 100
32 packages
found in
Top 1k
197 packages
found in
Top 10k
4489 packages
in community

Prevalence in PyPI community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
5 packages
found in
Top 100
48 packages
found in
Top 1k
291 packages
found in
Top 10k
6923 packages
in community

Prevalence in PyPI community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
8 packages
found in
Top 100
61 packages
found in
Top 1k
363 packages
found in
Top 10k
9109 packages
in community

Prevalence in PyPI community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
67 packages
found in
Top 100
520 packages
found in
Top 1k
3993 packages
found in
Top 10k
158349 packages
in community

Top vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities found.