Spectra Assure
Community
Docs
failIncident: Malware
Scanned: about 10 hours ago

vscodepython

Artifact:
latest
removed
malicious
Research
VS Code Python Integration
License: unknown
New!
Published: 2 days ago

Publisher: dfadhel


SAFE Assessment

Compliance

Licenses
No license compliance issues
Secrets
No sensitive information found

Security

Vulnerabilities
No known vulnerabilities detected
Hardening
84 misconfigured toolchains detected

Threats

Tampering
1 components prone to hijacking
Malware
3 analyst-vetted malware found

INCIDENTS FOR THIS VERSION:

malware
about 10 hours agoReported By: ReversingLabs (Researcher)
Learn more about malware detection
removal
Reported By: Community

Popularity

N/A
Total Installs
Contributor
Declared Dependencies
0
Dependents

Top issues

Problem

Threat researchers have manually inspected the software package and determined that it contains one or more malicious files. The detection was made by a hash-based file reputation lookup. This malware detection method is considered highly accurate, and can typically identify the malware family by name.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

1 packages
found in
Top 100
15 packages
found in
Top 1k
52 packages
found in
Top 10k
312 packages
in community

Next steps

Investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
Avoid using this software package.

Problem

Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) is a group of enhanced compile-time checks that report common coding mistakes as errors. These checks prevent the use of hard-to-secure string manipulation functions. They enforce static memory access checks, and allow only the use of range-verified string parsing functions. While these checks do not prevent every memory corruption issue by themselves, they do help reduce the likelihood.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

22 packages
found in
Top 100
104 packages
found in
Top 1k
197 packages
found in
Top 10k
774 packages
in community

Next steps

It's highly recommended to enable these checks for all software components used at security boundaries, or those that process user controlled inputs.
To enable these checks, refer to your programming language toolchain documentation.
In Microsoft VisualStudio, you can enable this feature by setting the compiler option /SDL to ON.

Problem

Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) are structured addresses that point to locations and assets on the internet. URLs allow software developers to build complex applications that exchange data with servers that can be hosted in multiple geographical regions. URLs can commonly be found embedded in documentation, configuration files, source code and compiled binaries. One or more embedded URLs were discovered to link to raw files hosted on GitHub. Attackers often abuse popular web services to host malicious payloads. Since code-sharing services URLs are typically allowed by security solutions, using them for payload delivery increases the odds that the malicious code will reach the user. While the presence of code-sharing service locations does not imply malicious intent, all of their uses in a software package should be documented and approved. An increasing number of software supply chain attacks in the open source space leverages the GitHub service to deliver malicious payloads.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

78 packages
found in
Top 100
618 packages
found in
Top 1k
4203 packages
found in
Top 10k
27868 packages
in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.
If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.
Consider an alternative delivery mechanism for software packages.

Problem

Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Software developers publish components they have authored to public repositories. Open source projects are the intellectual property of their respective authors. At any time, the authors may choose to completely remove the software component from a public repository. This often occurs when a software project reaches its end-of-life stage, or when the software authors lose interest in maintaining the project. This kind of removal frees up the software package name, its unique software identifier in the public repository, for other developers to use. However, new software project owners might have malicious intent. Threat actors are continuously monitoring popular package names in case their unique identifiers suddenly become available for hijacking. Once the software projects falls under new ownership, the new maintainers may opt to use the project popularity to spread malware to unsuspecting users.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

4 packages
found in
Top 100
52 packages
found in
Top 1k
264 packages
found in
Top 10k
26547 packages
in community

Next steps

Inspect behaviors exhibited by the detected software components.
If the software behaviors differ from expected, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
Revise the use of components that raise these alarms. If you can't deprecate those components, make sure that their versions are pinned.
Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

Problem

Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Software developers publish components they have authored to public repositories. While a new software project is a welcome addition to the open source community, it is not always prudent to indiscriminately use the latest components when building a commercial application. Irrespective of the software quality, the danger of being the first to try out a new project lies in the fact that the software component may contain novel, currently undetected malicious code. Therefore, it is prudent to review software component behaviors and even try out software component in a sandbox, an environment meant for testing untrusted code.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

0 packages
found in
Top 100
4 packages
found in
Top 1k
44 packages
found in
Top 10k
7143 packages
in community

Next steps

Check the software component behaviors for anomalies.
Consider exploratory software component testing within a sandbox environment.
Consider replacing the software component with a more widely used alternative.
Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

Top behaviors

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
21 packages
found in
Top 100
135 packages
found in
Top 1k
319 packages
found in
Top 10k
1413 packages
in community

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
65 packages
found in
Top 100
535 packages
found in
Top 1k
2853 packages
found in
Top 10k
14133 packages
in community

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
73 packages
found in
Top 100
570 packages
found in
Top 1k
2843 packages
found in
Top 10k
14439 packages
in community

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
70 packages
found in
Top 100
538 packages
found in
Top 1k
2415 packages
found in
Top 10k
11250 packages
in community

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Behavior often found in this community (Common)
28 packages
found in
Top 100
169 packages
found in
Top 1k
418 packages
found in
Top 10k
1486 packages
in community

Top vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities found.