Spectra Assure

failRisk: Vulnerabilities

Scanned:

SDE

Artifact:

latest

Top 10k

SDE

License: Permissive (Apache-2.0)

Published:

Publisher: jinmingjian

Visit GitHub

See on Visual Studio Code

SAFE Assessment

Compliance

Licenses

No license compliance issues

Secrets

No sensitive information found

Security

Vulnerabilities

6 severe vulnerabilities exploited

Hardening

2 low priority mitigations absent

Threats

Tampering

5 components with malware history

Malware

No evidence of malware inclusion

Overview issues25 vulnerabilities27 malware0 behaviors302 dependencies7 contributors1 versions9

List of software quality issues with the number of affected components.

Policies

Info

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known severe vulnerabilities. Available threat intelligence telemetry has confirmed that the reported high or critical severity vulnerabilities are actively being exploited by malicious actors.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

67 packages

found in

Top 100

548 packages

found in

Top 1k

3078 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.39k packages

in community

Next steps

We strongly advise updating the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as critical severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

60 packages

found in

Top 100

453 packages

found in

Top 1k

2271 packages

found in

Top 10k

12.07k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

We strongly advise updating the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as high severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

68 packages

found in

Top 100

555 packages

found in

Top 1k

3086 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.47k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

Update the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Operating systems execute application code in multiple privilege access levels. Separation of privileges is designed to protect the stability and integrity of the operating system by shielding it from issues that the user run applications may cause. However, some users may need to interact with higher privilege parts of the operating system to accomplish specific tasks. For this purpose, operating systems provide facilities that users may leverage to temporarily elevate their running privileges. Users with higher privileges can run any application with the same privilege level as their own. Attackers often try to trick privileged users into running malicious code, enabling them to infect the operating system. While the presence of code that elevates user privileges does not necessarily imply malicious intent, all of its uses in a software package should be documented and approved. Only select applications should consider using functions that can elevate user privileges. One example of acceptable use for such functions is allowing the users to install software packages and updates.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

33 packages

found in

Top 100

175 packages

found in

Top 1k

402 packages

found in

Top 10k

1.46k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.

Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1548 - Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

Problem

Software components are typically distributed in standardized packaging formats. Software packages are built from instructions written within package manifests that act as blueprints for package assembly. A package manifest declares the most important software properties, such as the package name, its authors and license, external dependencies, and various actions that may occur during the package lifecycle. Package managers are specialized tools used by developers to manage software components. Package managers read these manifests to deploy software components along with their dependencies. The premise of the package management system is that software components are isolated from each other, and that they rely on the package manager to provide their dependencies. However, it was detected that a software component includes code capable of accessing or modifying directories that are maintained exclusively by package managers. This is unusual as it resembles tactics used by threat actors that tamper with installed software components and inject malicious code into trusted execution paths.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

No prevalence information at this time

Next steps

Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.

Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1554 - Compromise Host Software Binary.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

Problem

Software components sometimes need to interact with sensitive parts of the runtime environment, often requiring privileged access to accomplish a task. Build pipeline configuration includes high-value information such as CI/CD platform secrets and tokens, pipeline definition files and runner configuration, build-time environment variables containing signing keys or deploy credentials, and artifact registry and package publishing credentials. That information is used by continuous integration and delivery systems. Attackers often abuse access to build pipeline configuration to harvest secrets from build environments, which can later be exfiltrated to attacker-controlled infrastructure and used to tamper with software releases or publish malicious artifacts under trusted identities. While the presence of code that accesses build pipeline configuration does not necessarily imply malicious intent, all of its uses in a software package should be documented and approved. Only select software components should consider using functions that read build pipeline configuration. One example of acceptable use for such functions is release tooling that reads publishing credentials to push artifacts.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

No prevalence information at this time

Next steps

Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.

Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1072 - Software Deployment Tools.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

Problem

Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) are structured addresses that point to locations and assets on the internet. URLs allow software developers to build complex applications that exchange data with servers that can be hosted in multiple geographical regions. URLs can commonly be found embedded in documentation, configuration files, source code and compiled binaries. One or more embedded URLs were discovered to link to raw files hosted on GitHub. Attackers often abuse popular web services to host malicious payloads. Since code-sharing service URLs are typically allowed by security solutions, using them for payload delivery increases the odds that the malicious code will reach the user. While the presence of code-sharing service locations does not imply malicious intent, all of their uses in a software package should be documented and approved. An increasing number of software supply chain attacks in the open source space leverage the GitHub service to deliver malicious payloads.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

79 packages

found in

Top 100

622 packages

found in

Top 1k

4233 packages

found in

Top 10k

29.36k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider an alternative delivery mechanism for software packages.

Problem

Export restrictions (or a restriction on exportation) are limitations on the quantity of goods exported to a specific country or countries by a Government. The European Union has imposed export restrictions on a number of countries and regions. These restrictions may or may not apply to digital goods such as software and other related intellectual property. It is advised that the reported findings are put in the usage context so that they can be audited and reviewed by the legal department before the software package is deployed. Current list of countries with export restrictions includes: Belarus (.by), Iran (.ir), Iraq (.iq), Libya (.ly), Myanmar (.mm), North Korea (.nk), Syria (.sy), Venezuela (.ve) and Zimbabwe (.zw).

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

13 packages

found in

Top 100

77 packages

found in

Top 1k

242 packages

found in

Top 10k

1.05k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

You should delay the software release until the legal review is completed.

Problem

Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Software developers publish components they have authored to public repositories. Some open source projects have a history of security lapses that culminated with a publication of one or more malicious component versions. To ensure that repeated supply chain incidents do not occur, the open source project should be closely monitored for up to two years. All software package versions that are published within two years of the malware incident will convey a warning about the history of security incidents tied to the open source project.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

25 packages

found in

Top 100

112 packages

found in

Top 1k

510 packages

found in

Top 10k

2.06k packages

in community

Next steps

Inspect behaviors exhibited by the detected software components.

If the software behaviors differ from expected, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

Revise the use of components that raise these alarms. If you can't deprecate those components, make sure that their versions are pinned.

Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

Problem

Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Software developers publish components they have authored to public repositories. Some open source repositories allow the developers to take down software component versions that they have published. For open source projects, version unpublishing is uncommon. Versions are typically removed due to a security incident, such as malicious code tampering or accidental development secrets exposure. Software developers often prioritize taking down such packages before informing the community that they have experienced a security incident. Therefore, it is prudent to review the reasons behind software version removals as these events might be a signal of an ongoing software supply chain attack.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

11 packages

found in

Top 100

39 packages

found in

Top 1k

152 packages

found in

Top 10k

1.25k packages

in community

Next steps

Review software component documentation for the reasons behind the recent version removal.

If the software version was removed due to a security incident, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

Revise the use of components that raise these alarms. If you can't deprecate those components, make sure that their versions are pinned.

Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

Did you know...

... that you can use ReversingLabs’ Spectra Assure platform to perform regular risk assessments of packages you develop in-house?

We recommend continuous software safeness monitoring through CI/CD integrations and pre-release/deployment checks. In addition to basic package information found on this page our platform offers rich reports for developers and DevSecOps that help them remediate all reported issues.

This website uses cookies to ensure the best website experience. By continuing to use this website you are giving your consent to cookies being used. Detailed information about our use of cookies is here.

List of software quality issues with the number of affected components.

Policies

Info

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

67 packages

found in

Top 100

548 packages

found in

Top 1k

3078 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.39k packages

in community

Next steps

We strongly advise updating the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as critical severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

60 packages

found in

Top 100

453 packages

found in

Top 1k

2271 packages

found in

Top 10k

12.07k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

We strongly advise updating the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as high severity.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

68 packages

found in

Top 100

555 packages

found in

Top 1k

3086 packages

found in

Top 10k

17.47k packages

in community

Next steps

Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.

Update the component to the latest version.

If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

33 packages

found in

Top 100

175 packages

found in

Top 1k

402 packages

found in

Top 10k

1.46k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.

Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1548 - Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

No prevalence information at this time

Next steps

Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.

Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1554 - Compromise Host Software Binary.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

No prevalence information at this time

Next steps

Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.

Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1072 - Software Deployment Tools.

Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

79 packages

found in

Top 100

622 packages

found in

Top 1k

4233 packages

found in

Top 10k

29.36k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.

Consider an alternative delivery mechanism for software packages.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

13 packages

found in

Top 100

77 packages

found in

Top 1k

242 packages

found in

Top 10k

1.05k packages

in community

Next steps

Investigate reported detections.

You should delay the software release until the legal review is completed.

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

25 packages

found in

Top 100

112 packages

found in

Top 1k

510 packages

found in

Top 10k

2.06k packages

in community

Next steps

Inspect behaviors exhibited by the detected software components.

If the software behaviors differ from expected, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

Revise the use of components that raise these alarms. If you can't deprecate those components, make sure that their versions are pinned.

Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

Problem

Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Software developers publish components they have authored to public repositories. Some open source repositories allow the developers to take down software component versions that they have published. For open source projects, version unpublishing is uncommon. Versions are typically removed due to a security incident, such as malicious code tampering or accidental development secrets exposure. Software developers often prioritize taking down such packages before informing the community that they have experienced a security incident. Therefore, it is prudent to review the reasons behind software version removals as these events might be a signal of an ongoing software supply chain attack.

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

11 packages

found in

Top 100

39 packages

found in

Top 1k

152 packages

found in

Top 10k

1.25k packages

in community

Next steps

Review software component documentation for the reasons behind the recent version removal.

If the software version was removed due to a security incident, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.

Revise the use of components that raise these alarms. If you can't deprecate those components, make sure that their versions are pinned.

Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.

SDE

SAFE Assessment

Compliance

Security

Threats

SQ31102Detected presence of severe vulnerabilities with active exploitation.Causes risk: actively exploited vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31104Detected presence of critical severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: critical severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31105Detected presence of high severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: high severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH16120Detected presence of software components that can elevate the user privileges.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH16129Detected presence of software components that can tamper with other installed software.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH16131Detected presence of software components that can access sensitive build pipeline configuration.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH17127Detected presence of files containing URLs that link to raw files on GitHub.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH18102Detected presence of files containing URLs that reside in regions with EU export restrictions.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH30101Detected presence of software components that had a recent malware or tampering incident.Causes risk: components with malware historyhunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH30104Detected presence of software components that had a recent package version removal incident.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

Did you know...

SQ31102Detected presence of severe vulnerabilities with active exploitation.Causes risk: actively exploited vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31104Detected presence of critical severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: critical severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

SQ31105Detected presence of high severity vulnerabilities.Causes risk: high severity vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH16120Detected presence of software components that can elevate the user privileges.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH16129Detected presence of software components that can tamper with other installed software.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH16131Detected presence of software components that can access sensitive build pipeline configuration.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH17127Detected presence of files containing URLs that link to raw files on GitHub.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH18102Detected presence of files containing URLs that reside in regions with EU export restrictions.hunting

Problem

Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community

Next steps

TH30101Detected presence of software components that had a recent malware or tampering incident.Causes risk: components with malware historyhunting

Problem