Top issues
Detected Windows executable files compiled without following the SDL best practices while using banned string functions.
Causes risk: misconfigured toolchains detected
hardening
Problem
Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) is a group of enhanced compile-time checks that report common coding mistakes as errors. These checks prevent the use of hard-to-secure string manipulation functions. They enforce static memory access checks, and allow only the use of range-verified string parsing functions. While these checks do not prevent every memory corruption issue by themselves, they do help reduce the likelihood.Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community
26 packages
found in
Top 100
110 packages
found in
Top 1k
219 packages
found in
Top 10k
867 packages
in community
Next steps
It's highly recommended to enable these checks for all software components used at security boundaries, or those that process user controlled inputs.
To enable these checks, refer to your programming language toolchain documentation.
In Microsoft VisualStudio, you can enable this feature by setting the compiler option /SDL to ON.
Detected presence of high severity vulnerabilities.
Causes risk: high severity vulnerabilities
vulnerabilities
Problem
Software composition analysis has identified a component with one or more known vulnerabilities. Based on the CVSS scoring, these vulnerabilities have been marked as high severity.Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community
68 packages
found in
Top 100
555 packages
found in
Top 1k
3086 packages
found in
Top 10k
17.47k packages
in community
Next steps
Perform impact analysis for the reported CVEs.
Update the component to the latest version.
If the update can't resolve the issue, create a plan to isolate or replace the affected component.
Problem
Operating systems execute application code in multiple privilege access levels. Separation of privileges is designed to protect the stability and integrity of the operating system by shielding it from issues that the user run applications may cause. However, some users may need to interact with higher privilege parts of the operating system to accomplish specific tasks. For this purpose, operating systems provide facilities that users may leverage to temporarily elevate their running privileges. Users with higher privileges can run any application with the same privilege level as their own. Attackers often try to trick privileged users into running malicious code, enabling them to infect the operating system. While the presence of code that elevates user privileges does not necessarily imply malicious intent, all of its uses in a software package should be documented and approved. Only select applications should consider using functions that can elevate user privileges. One example of acceptable use for such functions is allowing the users to install software packages and updates.Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community
33 packages
found in
Top 100
175 packages
found in
Top 1k
402 packages
found in
Top 10k
1.46k packages
in community
Next steps
Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.
Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1548 - Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism.
Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.
Problem
Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) are structured addresses that point to locations and assets on the internet. URLs allow software developers to build complex applications that exchange data with servers that can be hosted in multiple geographical regions. URLs can commonly be found embedded in documentation, configuration files, source code and compiled binaries. One or more embedded URLs were discovered to link to raw files hosted on GitHub. Attackers often abuse popular web services to host malicious payloads. Since code-sharing services URLs are typically allowed by security solutions, using them for payload delivery increases the odds that the malicious code will reach the user. While the presence of code-sharing service locations does not imply malicious intent, all of their uses in a software package should be documented and approved. An increasing number of software supply chain attacks in the open source space leverages the GitHub service to deliver malicious payloads.Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community
79 packages
found in
Top 100
622 packages
found in
Top 1k
4233 packages
found in
Top 10k
29.36k packages
in community
Next steps
Investigate reported detections.
If the software should not include these network references, investigate your build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
You should delay the software release until the investigation is completed, or until the issue is risk accepted.
Consider an alternative delivery mechanism for software packages.
Detected presence of software components that had a recent malware or tampering incident.
Causes risk: components with malware history
hunting
Problem
Software developers use programming and design knowledge to build reusable software components. Software components are the basic building blocks for modern applications. Software consumed by an enterprise consists of hundreds, and sometimes even thousands of open source components. Software developers publish components they have authored to public repositories. Some open source projects have a history of security lapses that culminated with a publication of one or more malicious component versions. To ensure that repeated supply chain incidents do not occur, the open source project should be closely monitored for up to two years. All software package versions that are published within two years of the malware incident will convey a warning about the history of security incidents tied to the open source project.Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community
25 packages
found in
Top 100
112 packages
found in
Top 1k
510 packages
found in
Top 10k
2.06k packages
in community
Next steps
Inspect behaviors exhibited by the detected software components.
If the software behaviors differ from expected, investigate the build and release environment for software supply chain compromise.
Revise the use of components that raise these alarms. If you can't deprecate those components, make sure that their versions are pinned.
Avoid using this software package until it is vetted as safe.
Top behaviors
Accesses system passwords.
steal
Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community
Behavior uncommon for this community (Uncommon)
8 packages
found in
Top 100
17 packages
found in
Top 1k
29 packages
found in
Top 10k
88 packages
in community
Retrieves the name of the user associated with the process.
search
Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community
Behavior often found in this community (Common)
26 packages
found in
Top 100
136 packages
found in
Top 1k
330 packages
found in
Top 10k
1.5k packages
in community
Deletes the value of a registry key.
registry
Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community
Behavior uncommon for this community (Uncommon)
12 packages
found in
Top 100
61 packages
found in
Top 1k
178 packages
found in
Top 10k
861 packages
in community
Deletes a registry key and its values.
registry
Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community
Behavior uncommon for this community (Uncommon)
13 packages
found in
Top 100
49 packages
found in
Top 1k
157 packages
found in
Top 10k
749 packages
in community
Requests permission to open other processes.
permissions
Prevalence in Visual Studio Code community
Behavior uncommon for this community (Uncommon)
12 packages
found in
Top 100
39 packages
found in
Top 1k
68 packages
found in
Top 10k
491 packages
in community
Top vulnerabilities
Vulnerability Exploitation Lifecycle
(9 Active Vulnerabilities)
9 (9 Fixable)
CVE-2025-21176h
CVE-2024-38229h
CVE-2025-26646h
None
None
None
Exploits Unknown
Exploits Exist
Exploited by Malware
Patching Mandated